Official Fulqrum Publishing forum
Page 4 of 4 « First 23 4
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Pilot's Lounge (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=205)
-   -   Arguments, speculations, rants and generally off-topic/repetitive topics megathread (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=25051)

Winger 08-27-2011 02:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adonys (Post 327660)
"minimum 2 weeks" might also be read as 2 months, 2 years, 2 decades, 2 hundred years, 2 thousand years or even never-ever.

the communication fault is of Luthier's who doesn't understand that, while saying "minimum 2 weeks" won't bound you to release anything after those 2 weeks time period (and it's a good thing he learned that), it still bounds you to give an update of the situation after the said 2 weeks, or close enough..

I still can't understand the failure of spending exactly 5 minutes to post something like "guys, we're sorry we couldn't managed it in two weeks, it seems we'll need another three at least, so see you then. thank you for your patience!"..
exactly my thoughts. Incompetent in communications.

Winger

Trumper 08-27-2011 02:41 PM
Took me seconds to copy/paste
" guys, we're sorry we couldn't managed it in two weeks, it seems we'll need another three at least, so see you then. thank you for your patience!"..
So come on Luthier and gang

Dano 08-27-2011 03:50 PM
What part of "two weeks minimum" is proving to be so hard to understand?

Zorin 08-27-2011 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano (Post 327713)
What part of "two weeks minimum" is proving to be so hard to understand?
1. Nothing is hard about that.
2. STILL what is so hard about taking two minnutes to post a simple sentence saying that it takes them a bit longer? NOTHING
3. Why don't they understand that they would appease a lot of the community by just doing that, posting regular updates that give rough directions for what is going on?

Seriously, how hard can it be?

albx 08-27-2011 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano (Post 327713)
What part of "two weeks minimum" is proving to be so hard to understand?
because can be also 2 years for a patch, so after the 2, now 3 weeks gone we expected some communication from them.

Chivas 08-27-2011 04:59 PM
Its also not that hard to figure out that things are going as well as hoped. Or for the conspiracy theorists " They have the patch done but really enjoy reading all the crap in the forums".

Dano 08-27-2011 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorin (Post 327733)
1. Nothing is hard about that.
2. STILL what is so hard about taking two minnutes to post a simple sentence saying that it takes them a bit longer? NOTHING
3. Why don't they understand that they would appease a lot of the community by just doing that, posting regular updates that give rough directions for what is going on?

Seriously, how hard can it be?
1) Apparently it is.

2) Redundant post, it's clear it's taking longer else we'd have a beta patch. Why waste Luthier's time asking him to post what we already know?

3) Appease? not a chance in hell with the denizens of this forum.

Tree_UK 08-27-2011 05:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas (Post 327744)
Its also not that hard to figure out that things are going as well as hoped. Or for the conspiracy theorists " They have the patch done but really enjoy reading all the crap in the forums".
Well stop posting crap.......

Fjordmonkey 08-27-2011 05:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK (Post 327746)
Well stop posting crap.......
Pot, meet kettle.

philip.ed 08-27-2011 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas (Post 327744)
Its also not that hard to figure out that things are going as well as hoped. Or for the conspiracy theorists " They have the patch done but really enjoy reading all the crap in the forums".
Chivas, were you one of the chaps that adovcated CloD was finished during the development updates, and that Oleg was just teasing us with obsolete screen-shots?

Chivas 08-27-2011 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK (Post 327746)
Well stop posting crap.......
I try to post crap to counter your crap, but your more full of it than I am.

Chivas 08-27-2011 05:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed (Post 327750)
Chivas, were you one of the chaps that adovcated CloD was finished during the development updates, and that Oleg was just teasing us with obsolete screen-shots?
Nope

Tree_UK 08-27-2011 05:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed (Post 327750)
Chivas, were you one of the chaps that adovcated CloD was finished during the development updates, and that Oleg was just teasing us with obsolete screen-shots?
Yes thats the one Philip, hook line and sinker i think the phrase is.

Tree_UK 08-27-2011 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas (Post 327761)
I try to post crap to counter your crap, but your more full of it than I am.
Yes indeed, shame that all my crap came to fruition.

Chivas 08-27-2011 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK (Post 327763)
Yes thats the one Philip, hook line and sinker i think the phrase is.
Try again Tree with a quote.

Chivas 08-27-2011 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK (Post 327764)
Yes indeed, shame that all my crap came to fruition.
Predicting delays in highly detailed complicated software is the easiest possible prediction. Everyone understands that, but hoped the development would have gone better, but if you want to take credit for the obvious be my guest.

furbs 08-27-2011 06:08 PM
Chivas, Tree(and one or two others) was predicting that the development was in serious trouble a long time before release and he was 100% correct.
He was attacked and called a fool(and worse) because of it.

Tree_UK 08-27-2011 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas (Post 327766)
Predicting delays in highly detailed complicated software is the easiest possible prediction. Everyone understands that, but hoped the development would have gone better, but if you want to take credit for the obvious be my guest.
Well I posting about SLI, and faked video's and that Oleg was no longer working on the project etc etc... I could go on but I really dont like to brag, most of the rational people here know that i was well ahead of the game. Some like yourself just have trouble in admitting that I was right, but I agree calling the delays was easy.

Tree_UK 08-27-2011 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fjordmonkey (Post 327747)
Pot, meet kettle.
Its nice to see there is another fanboy here other than freycinet, good work.

Fjordmonkey 08-27-2011 06:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK (Post 327774)
Its nice to see there is another fanboy here other than freycinet, good work.
If you had bothered to check, you'd noticed that I'm also all for fixing the game so that it's playable for the majority.:rolleyes:

What I DO have massive issues with is how you and other parts of the community behave and act. It's quite frankly childish, immature, rude and completely and utterly idiotic.

Then again, those are my opinions.

raaaid 08-27-2011 06:30 PM
oh come on poor nancy

im not adressing anyone i just love how it sounds

using this expresion in the ubizoo means an inminate vacation

oh memories :)

Mad G 08-27-2011 07:33 PM
Is Luthier MIA?
 
Or he is MIA, or he is overlaidback in Malibu beach under Califórnia sunshine and, girls, of course. Who would care for a flight sim?

Rextar 08-27-2011 07:37 PM
Your drivers are out of date.

AdamB 08-27-2011 07:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rextar (Post 327792)
Your drivers are out of date.
Just the reply I was looking for :grin:

Mad G 08-27-2011 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rextar (Post 327792)
Your drivers are out of date.
Any link? Thanks,

SiThSpAwN 08-27-2011 08:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rextar (Post 327792)
Your drivers are out of date.
Finally helpful posts!! 8)

ACE-OF-ACES 08-27-2011 08:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rextar (Post 327792)
your drivers are out of date.
classic! ;)

Tvrdi 08-27-2011 08:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad G (Post 327790)
Or he is MIA, or he is overlaidback in Malibu beach under Califórnia sunshine and, girls, of course. Who would care for a flight sim?
Woot ju saying? Updatezz? New zoundzz? Optimization? You want to pley may geym? Woot? Šturmovik? Tak da? To bilo...it used to be....nzzzzzzzjaaaaghhh!


http://i52.tinypic.com/20tjg9j.jpg

Chivas 08-27-2011 09:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs (Post 327770)
Chivas, Tree(and one or two others) was predicting that the development was in serious trouble a long time before release and he was 100% correct.
He was attacked and called a fool(and worse) because of it.
Nobody had a problem with Tree predicting that the sim was in serious trouble. It was the manor of his posts and insults towards the developer.

Redroach 08-27-2011 09:55 PM
stop these threads! Use a phuugging existing thread, there are many per week. If you have a hard time in reading comprehension, counseling is available.
I'm also not too delighted of the conduct of the development team. But one thread per Friday is sufficient, really. The *reply* buttons really DO work, you know?

ATAG_Doc 08-27-2011 10:52 PM
There are 5 who whose name will not be typed that constantly do it.

Chivas 08-27-2011 10:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad G (Post 327790)
Or he is MIA, or he is overlaidback in Malibu beach under Califórnia sunshine and, girls, of course. Who would care for a flight sim?
If luthier were a family member I would definitely be concerned, but since he's an unrelated developer who said hes working on a patch for COD, I wouldn't be too concerned, for quite a few weeks. Work this complicated takes time.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 AM.
Page 4 of 4 « First 23 4
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.