found this. 109 and hurri FRONT CRASH slow camera
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoWmVvE9qDU

Went for a cruise in a Tiger Moth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woH7UBYu67g

Game settings & computer specs are on info page of video on YouTube

And the prop goes .... not.

Is that the new eco friendly hybrid?? :grin:

Me too, but I cheated - http://www.vimeo.com/22002853

Funny how things work out sometimes, my clip just finished uploading literally minutes ago and I came here to post a link to it and saw yours too.

I'm sure you had more fun flying yours than I did mine though, I was literally nodding off to sleep it was running so slow and taking so long to record.

This is an fps test in London, after adjustinc graphic configuration. FPS measured in fraps were variable from 20 to 25, with some stutters sometimes when loading buildings. Perfectly flyable in the most hard scenario. Totally fine in other scenarios, with fps up to 40.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql4ixYRVSss

Pc used:
I7 920 overclocked to 3,33Ghz
6 GB RAM DDR3
Nvidia GTX275
Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bits

Relevant settings in Nvidia Panel:
AA set to 2x
Anisotropic filter deactivated

Graphic setting in the simulator:
Buildings, trees, scenario, effects: low
Planes, damage: high
Shadows and runways: activated
Grass: deactivated

Realism settings: full real except for external views

Wow just watched that stuka video and was amazed at the bomb explosion effects. Did anyone notice the shock wave rings on the terrain from the bomb explosion??

Pretty sweet!!

Ha, ya... I did have fun flying around. Your vid looks nice though, will be good once some of these things are patched up and we can get better performance.

I made these to show what playing CloD on an Eyefinity system would be like if they get around to enabling Crossfire/SLI support so you could actually play it like this. As it is now, I get 6 to 10 FPS on three screens, 5264x1050, with mostly low settings with as much turned off or down in the conf.ini as I could find. It's absolutely unplayable at this resolution.

To get this video, I played tracks at half speed and recorded them at 8 fps, then used VirtualDub to bring it back to normal speed, at 16 fps.This is why there is no sound. It was the best I could do, and it dragged my pc almost to a halt, lol. I hope the get this sorted out, if they do, it will be a beautiful game. I would think it could be done, because I can run Rise of Flight in eyefinity perfectly at high settings, everything on, total fluidly, on the same pc.:rolleyes:

My system specs are-

Intel Core I7 974 E
ATI HD 5770 x3 in Crossfire
6 gigs 1600 mhz DDR3
Windows 7 Pro 64 bit

Anyway, forgive the bad flying and shooting. All my controls seem overly sensitive, even though I used the in game axis settings to tone them down as much as possible. It's VERY hard to fly and shoot and hit anything compared to 1946... Watch them at youtube in maximum quality in full screen if you want to really see anything. Details are tiny and almost impossible to see when wide Eyefinity videos are constrained to the standard youtube window size.:-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdBQA5cQUFE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqKUxDVljME

I am shocked...
 

Horrible...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br4iB...layer_embedded

Does any body have seen at the begining of this COD video, that the Hurricane have 2 /two/ control sticks in to the cockpit - the one is with high resolution, and the other is with low resolution...Oleg? I have no words...

only happens when your model level is set to low......I havent seen that happen any other time, and there should be no need to set model to low because it has no hit on performance.

This has been acknowledged by Luthier, it's a bug in the Hurricane model when using low model detail.

I took a fraps video of me and my buddy experimenting with cod multiplay for the first time. :)
E8400 Dual core
Ati Saphire 5850 vid card
4gb Ram
Win7 64bit

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jBYCSaA2vI&feature=channel_video_title[/youtube]

Did she tell you before or afterwards?:lol:

Just recorded a .trk track for the first time and managed to export it as an AVI, making the unplayable .trk look playable on the highest video settings. Turns out I didn't have to do all that live playing and recording with FRAPS at low speed then speeding it up later in editing after all.

Still can't get the sound to work properly though, it's either distorted, or clear but looping, or not there at all, depending on my in-game audio settings. If anyone's got it working (why aren't you posting video's?) can you tell me what video codec and audio settings you're using? (There are work-arounds I guess, like just playing the track and recording the audio only and dubbing it onto the AVI, but it'd be better not to have to.) Must get some sleep now though.

Am I incorrect to say the Hurri was spinning the wrong way? Isn't the remaining wing suppose to rise and not fall since there is no resistance left on the other side of the plane?

It is probably going to rise because the remaining wing still generates lift. But yes, it was spinning the wrong way.

not necessarily, in this case the crash caused the wing to stall and the nose to point down, therefore the spinning is caused by drag. The left wing has more drag then... the air on the right so it forces the plane around. Just a note the plane will continue rotating with a lowered nose unless the wing starts to create lift again. It's basically an auto-rotating lone wing so the plane behaves like it's in an upside down spin. Nasty.

I go to this thread each morning. It is interesting to see the videos taken with different systems and different viewpoints of the poster.

At around:the 22th second into this vid you can see the actual trails of spend bullet casings from the shooting plane coming nose on.

Upon close examination, the spent bullet casings are visibly streaming from the bottom of each wing, before the first tracers ignite and come flying by.

What splendid details.

lol this guy would look even worse than the English Patient ;)

it shure needs some adjustment, injury taken by the pilot from fire, the plane exploding after burning for a while etc.

At least the fire look scary!

Here's a quick mission against 2 a.i. Beaufighters. Sorry it's a bit dark, the lighting looked so cool when I was playing, but compressed for Youtube it is hard to make out what I'm shooting at. I'm still getting used how much different it feels than IL2 '46. I turned headshake off, and even disabled 2 of the 6 "DOF" in my TIR profile to tame the pilots POV. In my opinion, the the headshake is way over done. With it on, it's extremely hard to get your eye to the crosshairs unless you fly straight and level.

Anyway, I'm very slowly figuring this thing out, and I'm starting to see what this game could be if they sort out the technical issues.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j-zc2mM9V8

Nice videos people :)

Very nice vid.

Just a collection of random clips I recorded while testing the new patch April 8. Works better for me, still have stutters here and there though. Starting at 2:15 you can see some incredible scenery just around London, but also a bit of stutters (did not affect gameplay though, was just a bit annoying).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_vOXoSmU84

Settings - Everything set to max it can go
1920x1080
Roads / Grass - Off
Shadows - On/Off on some clips.
Recorded during gameplay, not on playback track.

System:
i7-2600k - 3.4Ghz
gtx580 - 1.5gb mem (1 card)
16 gigs ram
game is installed on SSD

don't know if I will be able to run this sucker but the game looks amazing

I would like to see a defiant V something, just see if the AI turret gunner actually fires back.

Thanks

He111.

BTW, fantastic vids!

Nice :)

nice vid. makes me sick I have to wait.

Flying over london with a couple of mods, recorded during gameplay with fraps
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlmHZdeOXM0

Very nice and smooth! I haven't got COD yet, but how is it possible to see the mouse during gameplay like that, while moving your head?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ_lD7rp4x4

Online test.

there are two mouse modes in COD, one for mouse look and one for clicking things. I was looking around using the hat switch on the joystick

This game looks like a glorified IL2 to me, not a new game with a new engine. The clouds look just like IL2. After so many years, shouldn't they look like real clouds? Maybe I am expecting too much.

@ wilburnator
I've been interested in certain SOW:BoB (now ClOD) historically inaccurate aircraft Unit ID markings, both RAF and Luftwaffe, since many many long months ago in the weekly update Screencaps and later videos.

Now in this ClOD video, wilburnator, you are flying a Bf109E with markings 3U+AA. Is that a pre-packaged default skin, or did you create it yourself? The 3U would identify the Unit as ZG26; the final A would identify it as an aircraft of the Geschwader Stab; the third place A would usually be the letter for the aircraft of the Geschwader Kommodore, and should be Blue in color, not green, as would be all aircraft of the Geschwader Stab.

Also, as far as I know ZG 26 flew Bf110's, not Bf109's...(though earlier in the '39 timeframe II Gruppe of ZG26 for a time did apparently fly Bf109's)

So, the question is...in ClOD, was this aircraft skin a default one for ZG26? Or, did you just randomly select Unit ID letters for your Bf109?

It's just the skin the game picked for me. I haven't figured out how to choose skins in the qmb.

Thanks for the quick response. :)

Unfortunately, that is what I expected...:(

Here's something I just cooked up in the full mission builder. It's not a 'real' video as such, is totally non-historical and technically flawed. Just wanted to see how much stuff I could cram in, then got tired of messing around with it and decided to leave it as is. I could almost do a making-of documentary on it there was so much stuffing around involved.

Again, it was just meant to be a bit of fun, but when I first watched it back, I was a little bit shocked by the intensity of it. Not sure if anyone else will get the same impression, but it's reminded me of how terrifying what some of those guys went through, was.

Welcome to London, land of the little black clouds -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0hqgVjzzDM

Wow Les really nice video :)
It's so epic.

Thanks, I just recorded what the game put up in front of me. Am looking forward to what some of the more skilled movie-makers can come up with using these new features.

Wery nice vid to watch! :)

Slow motion takedown of plane... Youtube really botched up the HD versions and added a lot of jaggies, doesn't look that bad in the original... Still looks neat anyways.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHGintpLmB4

Nice :)

What are all those black straight line things , seemingly coming from flak explosions? If intend to represent shrapnel, I'd say the effect is totally unrealistic.

They look like the same 'lines' some can see in their field of vision, I think it's the same graphical glitch.

How many planes do you have in the air?

Great videos guys! Thanks for sharing with us all.

Someone said he can't break his undercarriage when rough landing, this is what did happen me today:

[youtube]oI40f5pbbRU[/youtube]

I've read somewhere they are in fact meant to represent shrapnel, and I agree they look way overdone IMO, even on a small scale.

324 spawned at the start.

Each Squadron consisted of three Flights of three planes (=9 planes). There were six such Squadrons per group (=54 planes). And there were six such groups (=324 planes).

Only one group of 54 planes continued on into London, minus however many losses they had along the way.

There were three-hundred '30-inch 20 CWT QF Mk.1 Stand-Alone B' artillery lined up along their flight path to greet them.

Just so there's no confusion, this was not playable. I slowed the game down to it's slowest running speed, put the plane under AI control, and recorded using FRAPS at 16fps, then sped it up again in editing. I just wanted to see what it would look like on maximum settings and with a huge amount of objects on screen. I think I could cram more in and would like to set up a more realistic scenario, but it would take a lot of effort.

Nice video. I love the way the gear just collapsed in a seemingly realistic way, for what appears to be a realistic reason, without just suddenly breaking off. It gives a good impression of components being modelled to fail properly under stress.

'Defending Hawkinge'
 

A video I made of the already awesome COD!!! It was my 1st attempt at creating a quick scenario with the Full Mission Builder.

Absolutely loving the videos so far on this thread btw ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7IM-sd6rpQ

At the risk of becoming a spammer, here's a quick video taken while playing around with the clouds in the full mission builder. Was trying to arrange something to look like an overcast sky, and flying under some low level clouds was as close as I got.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPFZ3J1BF2c

Very well done video! You've shown off a lot of features of ClOD. Very decent editing of your video as well; in terms of movie-making, I'd not use the fancy scene transition effects, but that is only if you go on to make a full up Video/Movie, rather than a demo of ClOD.

If you do have an interest in making a "Movie", think about developing a story/screenplay. If you do that, I think you'll be on the right track for 'success' as a Cliffs of Dover film-maker! ...and I hope you will consider becoming one.

It is not too early in the ClOD era for those of us at the Flight Sim Movies website to begin looking for a new crop of movie-makers and their Movies, using ClOD to enthrall the community with marvelous "Tales of the Battle of Britain" using ClOD. Remember, the golden rule is to create a "story" with a beginning, middle, and end...and get the viewer to emotionally connect with your main character(s).

Again, thanks for showing your vid in this thread!

Great video. Amongst all the negative comments, this revived a lot of my excitement. Can't wait to fly.

Another fps test, with the zone usually used to do so... the center of London. The more risky maneuvers able to do, that is because fps were more stable :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQltjkRhWgU

Computer specs and detailed graphic settings are on the description of the video...

Only 1.00.13954 Official patch, NOSSAO and "Aero Off" used. Lowtex does not improve nothing and Nomipmap is horrible by a few fps more... at least, for me :)

High increase of fps, so now I will dedicate to fly :)

Thanks Luthier and 1C team for the patch and thanks to the community for the tweaks and mods! This great simulator is definitely not a game! :)

Really nice videos people :)
Great job.

Here's a video of the single player London sightseeing mission. The settings are low except the a/c model. This is a huge improvement, because a few days ago I wouldn't have been able to get 5 fps in this scenario, and now I can fly around relatively smoothly, thanks to the nossao and the lotex mod.

I clipped the wing flying under that last bridge at the end and sheared off the wingtip. The plane flew on, but I could feel the effect of the missing wingtip. The video ends with a parachute ride...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLavqSNPxEg

This is my first vid just a test of FRAPS and Youtube HD uploading.btw FRAPS didn't have any performance effect on my machine .I like the damage model in COD looks great 0:36

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNeWr7RaOVo

london sightseeing
maximum video options+nossa+lowtext (1920x1080):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSHJ_utaWtQ

So beautiful videos :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgkR7...layer_embedded
On the end of video settings.
What are you using for video record? Fraps is decreasing FPS :(

Impressed at how fast all those houses get built and knocked down on the ground......they're just popping in and out all over the place :(

Oh, well, maybe in 2-years we'll get rid of the most annoying feature in IL2.....sorry CloD.

Nice video though. Cheers, MP

Not really that impressive when you learn how they do it, it's called LOD - leave of Detail, and it relates to the distance between the camera and any item. if very close, then the building is a full mesh, a certain longer distance away, then the mesh might be 1/2 detailed, even further away - long distance, the building might be only a 2 dimensional picture "sprite" " billboard". Well that's the trick most 3D game builders have been using for many years, not sure about COD?

BTW, anyone see if the defiant fights back or is it a AI clay pigeon? would be nice to see a Condor flying too!

He111.

to 313_paegas
my settings for a smooth video with FRAP are 50fps

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnvvviaZeQY

cheers

There's an example on my blog: http://fooblog.mexxoft.com/amtsgerichtsgebaude/

Br.20 bomb wth!?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-9I9lJptV8

Here's some more FMB cloud 'action' - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DwZGxbRLIU

I swear in some of that video I could see a vapour stream behind the aircraft like it was pulling cloud into its wake.........

There was definitely a stream at certain points, but I think it was from having complex engine management on and temporarily switching from AI control to very basic (up/down/left/right) keyboard (engine-killing) controls. Which is to say, it was probably just fuel vapour, or something else to do with me misusing the plane's engine.

Someone on one of these forums, perhaps in this thread, a few days ago was adamantly expressing disappointment, whining about the clouds not being any good, unrealistic, etc.

I think from this video that they look absolutely marvelous! Exceptionally realistic!

I agree. But to be honest, as I stated in the description on Youtube, these are very selective shots and angles I've used. If I'd looked left or right in most places I would have seen clouds popping in and out of view or just plain bugging out, or the more typical cotton-ball type of formations. I'm not entirely certain, as I haven't tried, but I don't think it would actually be possible to make a mission where you'd only see the kinds of clouds I've shown in the video. I think it proves what could be possible though, once the bugs get worked out and further improvements are made to bring the new weather effects into a more finished state.

Seems the Merlin engines were "hot-Swap" replaceable, too bad the Hurricane wasn't build with engine redundancy.

Thanks for the clarification. Good job in video editing then.

Theres a new video on youtube posted by Oleg but its private.Can someone try to watch it?

This one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-CZvp2YQRA

The settings in the video are mostly set to low. It looks better at higher settings, but then there are pause here and there, and you're still going to see some of this. At this point, the buildings popping in and out of existence I'll take... a week ago I could not get more than 5 fps anywhere over London.

Personally, I wish they had worried a lot less about scenery on the ground, and focused on some other issues instead. For example, Rise of Flight has simpler, yet still perfectly nice looking scenery on the ground, and my PC can run that game at 5246x1050 on three screens on high settings TWICE as fast as it can run CloD at 1680x1050 on one screen at low settings. But I'm sticking it out, I now have it working well enough to play and have a little fun. It'll only get better.;)

I thought it was a new video.

You can also notice that the engine outputs flames are present, that's mean it is a pre-patched version.

haha the ending is the best

Haha I also laughed at the end, good job

Awesome video, I watched it about three times in a row :-P

actually if full engine management is on, flames from exhausts are visible ;)

Nice vids btw gents :) poor bus lmao

After managing to not damaging my own engines, I made into combat...

In this one I've ran out on ammo by my bad aiming and tried to make a Taran maneuver without success. It was recorded from a track, no stutterinbg or fps problems when flying from the cockpit, but watching the action with so close proximity while recording video reduces fps, so I've done it in slow motion and accelerated a bit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGocgWC2utc

Note that the big piece fallen from below the Ju is the lower gunner broken window, at the instant he was killed.



This other one was recorded in real time while fighting in a 45 planes merge over the channel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep6F5tqZKHU

Got no fps or suttering problems if I was not recording, except if there were too much effects when attacking Ju-88's. Zero kills at the end, it's a bit more difficult to shot down anybody, and there's also an important fact about the pilot: I simply need more combat training! :)

I have the same general performances that when I flew 1946 with a dual core. If I not record video I can fly pretty good. If I record, I can still fly and combat, but fps fall. So I'll look for hardware improvement, like I've did in every new interesting simulator on the market since a lot of years ago. :)

Nice vids :)

first vid
 

one of a start of many i hope
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r8aTOHgSnw

Did i see that correct,is the aileron still in place from the shot-off wing?

Make shure to set your fraps to more than one core and FPS to more than 30 also you can do it half size.

Yes @37 seconds,-- after the Spitfire collides with it.The aileron is flying in formation with the plane it's not attached to.

inertia?

Doubt it,there are too many variables between it and the main wing,weight,mass,centre of gravity,collision impact forces,collision impact direction of movement,etc.This follows perfectly in formation as if still joined.

2 AIs coming in collision during a coop game. Made me laugh :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oImdCEs1N64

Very nice video

ps : "Ouiii fumé !" :)

It's a track, or it's recorded in real time while flying?

There's a difference between things that happen when flying vs watching the track.

In Il-2 it was worse. I had serious problems with tracks being corrupted, even offline.


As an example, I recorded this video from a track:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ1A3aNitnA

There were birds all around the bridge, that are not in the track as reviewed. Also vehicles behaved a little different.