Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Pilot's Lounge (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=205)
-   -   Let's Put Cliffs of Dover in Context. (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=35090)

fruitbat 10-22-2012 12:06 PM

Avro, you've done it again, you really are the master!

Just a few things to add to the pot.

Neville Chamberlain gets far to much bad press, one thing that many people ignore or don't know is that in history books, written after the 30 year rule on official secrets rather than before, is that he was instrumental in the rearming of Britain after Munich, indeed in Oct '38 straight after Munich he told the cabinet, and i quote "It would be madness for the country to stop rearming until we were convinced that other countries would act in the same way. For the time being, therefore, we should relax no particle of effort until our deficiencies had been made good"

It is a fact that by the time war broke out, the RAF in particular was in a much much better position to fight, than in 1938. Munich bought much needed time. In fact it was Chamberlain from as early as 1935 that pushed for the RAF to be strengthened realising that Britain's traditional bulwark, the English Channel, was no defence against air power.

He was also the person who pushed for the treaties with Poland, getting France involved.

As for Churchill, there is no doubt that he was the right man for the job during the war years, but do not forget, that the same British people that loved him, unceremoniously booted him out of office at the wars end in a landslide victory for Clement Attlee.

BadAim 10-22-2012 09:26 PM

I never new that about Chamberlain! I shall have to return to my history books!

As for Winston's end, Themistocles much? History does tend to repeat itself, dunnit?

major_setback 10-23-2012 01:48 PM

Interesting speech on arming the forces:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkPptevWftw

I heard another of his speeches the other day in a documentary. He was warning Germany very strongly about the consequences of their planned expansion. I am trying in vain to remember which programme it was shown in (I saw it in England).

arthursmedley 10-23-2012 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by major_setback (Post 472413)
consequences of their planned expansion.

They had a plan!?

fruitbat 10-23-2012 06:10 PM

yep, attack Russia and loose.

zander 10-23-2012 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fruitbat (Post 472479)
yep, attack Russia and loose.

Russia was doable, not with with US support though.

arthursmedley 10-23-2012 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zander (Post 472560)
Russia was doable, not with with US support though.

Not a hope in hell, with or without US support and Hitler realised this by Christmas 1941.

WTE_Galway 10-23-2012 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arthursmedley (Post 472574)
Not a hope in hell, with or without US support and Hitler realised this by Christmas 1941.

Possible with the support of recently liberated Soviet occupied countries like the Ukraine who were not particularly fans of Stalin. However the NSDAP agenda did not endear the German's to these recently liberated potential allies and instead they antagonized the local population and faced partisan warfare.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.