Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - Blacksix can you explane!

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)

- - Blacksix can you explane! (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=32735)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Continu0 (Post 436408)

What is the downside of keeping DX9 if they have to support it in clod anyway?

It could:
- limit you
- result in additional costs(if, f.i. some bugs were DX9 related)

So tomorrow we will see next beta patch or again only promises and sentence with very soon and sorry m8s but we work on hard?

Leave this Dx9 for final patch, dont need now, only, clouds, ai, comms, some of bugs from bugtrucker.

But the next beta is for DX9 bug killing.

And as mentioned they can't drop DX9 because it is written on the Box.

Simple facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodoss (Post 436421)

But the next beta is for DX9 bug killing.

And as mentioned they can't drop DX9 because it is written on the Box.

Simple facts.

In fact Kodoss, your facts are so simple, some people can't even comprehend them. Stop writing facts and truths here, can't you understand people want other reasons for bashing this product? reasons that suits them.

On the plus side, BlackSix can now speak fluent English when talking about DX9 and Clod support :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by _YoYo_ (Post 436419)

Quote:

Originally Posted by _YoYo_ (Post 436419)

But we will never get the final patch if they dont test DX9, so you just are not getting it... they need to test DX9. So let it go....

First there were people crying over the 10 bucks they paid and saying the box art didn't reflect the real content. I can understand this.
Now they cry over the developers trying to provide something that's shown on the box art. That however is just insane.

How can they leave dx9 for the final patch? It needs to be tested as well. Also it's eventually required for engine license contracts. You guys not only don't have a development background but also not even common sense.

Either you could help with testing if you're so eager to see it getting done (even if it means running the game in dx9) or just wait one week longer. Hell, it's summer. Go out and do something damnit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aer9o (Post 436354)

Thank you for your reply... however I find it quite extrodinary that you think the "sample of votes are not relevant". . . . . snip ?

He DID NOT say "not relevant" -

He said, "not representative " - a VERY big difference.

He is correct, your wording of the poll and sampling group do not represent the greater market. Your sampling and wording is not congruent with sampling techniques.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madfish (Post 436431)

First there were people crying over the 10 bucks they paid and saying the box art didn't reflect the real content. I can understand this.
Now they cry over the developers trying to provide something that's shown on the box art. That however is just insane.

Just out of curiosity, why was fully supporting DX9 not an important issue from day 1? For the last year we have not heard squat about this, now, a year later, it's so important that they are holding back other fixes until they get it ironed out? Smells a little fishy to me....