Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   BETA PATCH v1.06.17582 thoughts. (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=31834)

SiThSpAwN 05-07-2012 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcler002 (Post 421201)
The title says it all... lol

I havnt really been with clod lately... just waiting (like everyone else) for the game to ...run smooth? work? provide neutral performance for all?!

I am talking online, and it doesnt matter if you dont have custom skins, your settings might be set to download others customs skins as they come into game using them.

Check your network settings...

andrea78 05-07-2012 06:33 PM

bah... it's about 3 months that dev talk about "huge" improvement in fps... so that beta.

"double average FPS" are not words by whiners or trolls: B6 wrote that 5.5.2012 about the beta. Why? Are we kids to tell tales?

So? Is there a problem in communication? Is there a problem of player's comprehension?

It is not the first time. It is not professional. It is not whining.

Please, next time release patch without ridicolous opinion.

Insuber 05-07-2012 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN (Post 421321)
I am talking online, and it doesnt matter if you dont have custom skins, your settings might be set to download others customs skins as they come into game using them.

Check your network settings...

I disabled Custom Skins in the Network settings, but I still have the 0.5-1s stutters.

SiThSpAwN 05-07-2012 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Insuber (Post 421458)
I disabled Custom Skins in the Network settings, but I still have the 0.5-1s stutters.


Ok, well it was worth a shot, and really these arent stutters, they are more of pauses, and they usually happen when someone joins the server, sorry, tried :/

TonyD 05-07-2012 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrea78 (Post 421399)
bah... it's about 3 months that dev talk about "huge" improvement in fps... so that beta.

"double average FPS" are not words by whiners or trolls: B6 wrote that 5.5.2012 about the beta. Why? Are we kids to tell tales?

So? Is there a problem in communication? Is there a problem of player's comprehension?

It is not the first time. It is not professional. It is not whining.

Please, next time release patch without ridicolous opinion.

Using the ‘Black Death’ recorded track, my average frame rate went from 27fps before the patch to 46fps afterwards – not quite double, but close. What cpu do you have – is it a dual-core or a quad-core? luthier stated “If you have a dual core you will still see a tiny improvement, but it won't be as much as a quad or 8 core.” Have you tested your average frame rate before and after?

It would help if you posted your system spec (or put it in your signature, as previously requested) and what problems you are having – there are many here that will have a similar system that may be able to help.

You should also realise that this was not an officially released patch that was supposed to improve the game; it’s a ‘beta’ patch available to anyone willing to test and report bugs that may not have been found by the dev’s. If this doesn’t suit you, wait for the officially released version to become available.

Ataros 05-07-2012 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrea78 (Post 421399)
Is there a problem of player's comprehension?

It is not the first time.

Yes. The patch notes say "Most recommended-spec machine will see a roughly double average FPS".

Depends on particular PC hardware, drivers and weather a player switches off epilepsy filter and closes browser, ICQ, skype, real-time antivirus scanners, etc. while playing. :mrgreen:

PotNoodles 05-07-2012 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ataros (Post 421557)
Yes. The patch notes say "Most recommended-spec machine will see a roughly double average FPS".

Depends on particular PC hardware, drivers and weather a player switches off epilepsy filter and closes browser, ICQ, skype, real-time antivirus scanners, etc. while playing. :mrgreen:

While it does depend somewhat on the above this isn't the fix in this case. I have a quad core 17 930, overclocked to 4.0Ghz and I have seen little in the way of improvements to my FPS. According to Blacksix post I should be getting around double, but in reality I have an increase of about 3 or 4 FPS. There is no reason why I shouldn't get what Blacksix has stated, I have the hardware and i'm pretty peed off about that statement to be honest. The game is the cause of this problem not the hardware. Graphics cards and ram all have limits to what they can and cannot do, but when the game has wide spread problems as this one obviously does, then it's the game.

Hooves 05-07-2012 11:14 PM

The fault isnt with the patch being buggy, its the patch being buggy after 14 months of post release development.

This single handedly killed the squadron I fly with, because we want to do an online campaign going up against large formations, we were all holding on for that. Now its no where in sight.

I dont even know what to think other than that if this is how a 14month post release game is handled, why on earth would I pay money and suffer through mistake after mistake with another title...BOM. In fact I think that title (BOM) might actually be representative of 1C's performance throughout this debacle, from actual game fixing to customer relations all the way down to the treatment of forum posters.

Sad really we have no where else to go, but were all headed away any way.

Frequent_Flyer 05-07-2012 11:48 PM

In many important ways COD is light years ahead of IL-1946. The damage models ,cockpits and the landscape to name my personel top three. I was looking forward to someday in the near future implementing working clouds and weather that does not bring my machine to its knees.
Based upon this " beta " patch it would seem this realization is a long way off. This is disappointing to me.

David198502 05-08-2012 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz (Post 420984)
People will stay and play if we have regular updates and patches to test..simple as that..

Id rather have an unfinished Alpha/Beta whatever you wanna call it to test and see than nothing at all...its the nothing at all that f*ks people off, especially at this stage of the game as in when it was first released.

Plus it helps the Devs...

For the life of me I don't know why we were not testing this before now, I guess they have their reasons

+1
waiting half a year, and seeing this result is a bit disappointing to say at least.in my view they should from now on give us patches as quick as possible, even if it affects only minor aspects of the game, which we could test.
i mean, the devs didnt encounter launcher crashes for months now, and as soon as they release this alpha version of a patch, the bug section is flooded with comments like:experienced 15crashes today..
i think it would help the game if they would release anything they think they achieved to the community immediately, to be tested by a broader range of systems.
then at least we would have something to do.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.