Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   I'll just LOVE it NOW (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=30136)

Kankkis 03-03-2012 10:27 AM

Weird, what are your other specs and have you deleted ubisoft intro?

Steuben 03-03-2012 10:38 AM

yes intro is deleated.

got an AM2 Asus Mainboard, Amd 1055T6Core Cpu, Gigabyte 7970 card, 8 GB Corsair ram! HD 1000GB and 400 GB!

Driver is 12.3 pre WHQL from guru3d.

Hooves 03-03-2012 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kankkis (Post 396317)
Weird, what are your other specs and have you deleted ubisoft intro?

whoa how do you delete the intro? That adds FPS?

Kankkis 03-03-2012 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooves (Post 396320)
whoa how do you delete the intro? That adds FPS?

With some Ati cards yes, it leaves GPU to 2D speeds.

Steuben 03-03-2012 10:51 AM

I got it!!!!!


Despite the fact i deleted the intro the GPU is staying at 501 MHZ!

Must be a powerplay issue! Maybe i can resolve it with a profile!


Ok fixed it but not better performance! Afterburner was showing wrong numbers!

Ataros 03-03-2012 12:49 PM

This engine was not developed for resolutions higher than 1920x1080. Let's hope a patch can help or we have to wait till 2013-2015 videocards for extreme (higher than fullHD) res. Nothing comes for free. Resolution neither.

Clouds, weather and landscape improvements in BoM will put new hardware to its knees again on extreme resolutions. The devs optimise for mainstream resolution only because further optimisation for extreme resolutions is too costly in terms of resources used and image quality hit.

Solution is to use mainstream resolution or buy a new top video card every 6 - 12 months if you are rich. Sims are more demanding than any shooters due to high visibility distances and modelling detail.

Steuben 03-03-2012 01:20 PM

Ataros will test with that resolution! Maybe its better

vranac 03-03-2012 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steuben (Post 396319)

got an AM2 Asus Mainboard, Amd 1055T6Core Cpu, Gigabyte 7970 card, 8 GB Corsair ram! HD 1000GB and 400 GB!

I think you have a problem with processor speed.
You should try to overclock it to 3.5 GHz at least, but only with aftermarket
cooler if you have one, because thubans are hot.
Also, you should check how many phases your mobo have on VRM ( voltage regulation ).

ACE-OF-ACES 03-03-2012 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tvrdi (Post 396291)
Quote:

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES (Post 396086)
As many have been saying.. Alot of the CoD issues can be cured by simply upgrading the hardware!

no shhh...

Tvrdi.. I know the fact that a better video card and correctly configured PC goes against everything you and the rest of the nay-sayers would have people belive.. That being that CoD does not work for anyone.. But the fact remains that there are plenty of posts in this forum of people who are having no problems with the FPS or CTD.. And in light of your response of 'shhh' to counter that fact only highlights it

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tvrdi (Post 396291)
Badly optimised software needs cutting edge hardware to work decently. That is when the effects are not near (in CLODs case).

Now your getting it!! So it appears that you actually do agree with me! Better late than never! S!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tvrdi (Post 396291)
Properly optimised software willl work well, even on "mid range rigs".

Now you getting it!! So you do understand why 1C is taking the time to optimize the code! This is a big step forward for you Tvrdi! You have come a long way in just two posts! Keep up the good work!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tvrdi (Post 396291)
I have an ace-like question for you: "Do you think ROF is not a cutting edge software (whatever that means)? Because it works damn good even on low-mid rigs....

So your baseline is RoF?

That explains a lot about your current and past statements!!

Allow me to explain why your comparsion is in error

1) Apparently you are un-aware of the fact that RoF is a DX9 program.. And that the DX9 API has been around for some time now, which means there are a lot of experienced DX9 programers to choose from and thus easier to program the game. Where as CoD is a DX10 program that uses the DX11 API.. The DX11 API is new, and very different from previous DX APIs, thus the DX11 API is not as well understood as DX9, mater of fact Microsoft is still working out some of the bugs in it, which all means there are less experienced DX11 programers to choose from and thus harder to programer the game.

2) Apparently you are un-aware and or don't remember what RoF was like when it first came out.. RoF like CoD was not a bugless sim when it was released back in 2009.. It took Neoqb years to get RoF into the state it is today.. And during that time Neoqb gout bought out by 777 studios! So, imho it is disingenuous of you to compare CoD which has been out for less than a year to a game that has been out for nearly 3 years. And try to remember that RoF has a near constant cash flow due to charging for add ones!! Where as CoD does not! Currently the only CoD can generate more development money is to produce a sequel/addon or find someone willing to invest in the product. Which explains why CoD is allready working on a sequal

So now that you are up to speed on RoF I hope you can understand why RoF works so well on lower end systems.. i.e. RoF has had more time and more money to optimize the code and RoF is still a DX9 game thus unless they upgrade to the DX11 API you will never see the DX11 features in RoF that we are soon to see in CoD.. Now 1C could have done the same as Neoqb.. It would have been easier to do.. But as we are now seeing.. 1C has had a much bigger vision for this game engine than Neoqb had for RoF

ACE-OF-ACES 03-03-2012 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buchon (Post 396293)
Anyway, if you guys are waiting to play this game maxed in a 3 years old card let me say that it will not happen even if you hired John Carmack to scribe the game in machine language (that is in ones and zeros if you don't know it)

To much people comes from play IL-2 1946 in a laptop and cry rivers because can run CLOD well when is know that maxed setting is for futures hardware profiles.

+1 Exactally!


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.