Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- FM/DM threads (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=196)

- - Su26 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=27192)

Quote:

Originally Posted by TUCKIE_JG52 (Post 363607)

PS: Faucon, I'm looking for your great videos and all of them were deleted on youtube, what happened?

Deleted by youtube ;)

Here is the new one. I just uploaded 2 videos of some flights with Cap10.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Cap10Aer...s?feature=mhee

Quote:

Originally Posted by Faucon (Post 363856)

Deleted by youtube ;)

Here is the new one. I just uploaded 2 videos of some flights with Cap10.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Cap10Aer...s?feature=mhee

Nice to see you online again, but I'm missing your virtual videos like "Rolls", and specially, your VFAT 2010 display, that unfortunately missed and it's not on livestream...

I see we are flying almost the same plane, you fly the Cap10C, I the Cap10B. Someone told me that C is more agressive, I don't know...
Comparing to 1946, I've found that apart on power, Ki-27 behaves very similar in some aspects to our Mudry, what do you think?

And just one more thing... Alabeo, the new company I told in the previous page, has announced today his first aerobatic addon... the Pitts S-1S, but... for FSX :(

I think they'll doing a big mistake, only eye candy, no good FM! :(

http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/6088/snap1vz.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by atag_snapper (Post 351227)

i bought it for the trains. When will they become flyable?

rotfl

Quote:

Originally Posted by trumps (Post 351132)

Why on earth would anyone buy a BoB sim and not play it because the Sukoi didn't make the cut?

It is strange..

I think a lot of the people who complain in this forum have that kid in the back seat mentality..

Where they think if they ask 'ARE WERE THERE YET' every 30 seconds that it will some how magically make the distance between point A and point B shorter.

When in fact the only real effect it has is on the driver (in this scenario Luther) who learns to tune these kid-os out..

Well that is the modern PC effect..

Back in the day the effect use to be that of the driver spinning around and backhanding the kid-o while doing 75 down the road..

Another true parenting skill that has been lost in the modern PC world ;)

But I digress..

In summary the scary part is the kid-o really believes he is helping by making the distance between point A and point B shorter!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Faucon (Post 363856)

Deleted by youtube ;)

Here is the new one. I just uploaded 2 videos of some flights with Cap10.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Cap10Aer...s?feature=mhee

Wow, just wow!!!
S!

Quote:

Originally Posted by TUCKIE_JG52 (Post 363789)

Ahh, I like the "positive" and "open mind" way behind your words! ;)

Sorry, but this is an excellent propeller plane sim, not only WWII. If people don't see far beyond it's not the problem of the rest of the simmers who want realistic planes in a realistic simulator instead of eye-cany planes in non realistic simulators.

Anyway, the more planes there will be, the more best seller will it be. Want it or not, civillian planes on civillian simulators sells more than combat planes in a combat simulator only. The key to survive is spread to more markets.

And talking about realism, some real flyers are expecting more realistic flight model effects to be implemented in CoD, like true P-Effect, and specially, PROPWASH, there's not only torque on a propeller plane! Hope all these will be implemented on future FM reworks!

Some of us already use 1946 as a serious training for real life aerobatics. Ki-27 behaves very similar to the plane I fly. So we also want this kind of real training in CoD.

HI Tuckie, I agree with you regarding the "economic" aspects of your words, and the FM modelled in the sim, no doubt at all about that. :-)

Said that, what I do not consider a priority, neither should be for the devs, and I do not agree with, is to start including "extras" in a WW2 combat sim that needs to be deeply fixed first. :confused:

Once it is fixed, everything is running as expected and all the WW2 combat simmers are happy with the product they should be hands-free to spend as many efforts they consider adequate in order to bring aerobatic planes or even a 747 so they can steal Microsoft's FSX market into IL2 CoD if they want to, but until we reach that moment I think it is not serious to start other sub projects, they should focus on fixing the WW2 sim, that is what it is in the first term regardless if the FM is better or worse, or if it is good to make more profit on a non yet finished product or not, and first make customers who bought their longly expected WW2 combat flight sim happy.

I just built my home-made cockpit at home last month, and I would be really interested and could be asking for an additional feature implemented in the sim in order to get support for external gauges and not having to develop it by myself. Am I doing so?, No.

For me this would be more interesting than aerobatics which I'm am not interested about at all, but I think there are more important things that should be dealt with before starting dealing with particular or minority requests, that's all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Faucon (Post 351436)

COD is the only simulator with correct FM to do aerobatics. FS is far far far far behind (I've tried the Extra300 and some addons, it's just ridiculous). IL2 is even better.
Or I've never heard about another good simulator. If it exists I would be glad if you tell me.

The reason why I bought COD is not your problem. If it wouldn't be so unfinished (at its release), may be I could say I didnt buy it only for aerobatics.

Tried X-Plane? Thats supposed to be an improvement on FSX FMs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATAG_Bliss (Post 363298)

lol you guys. In all seriousness though, Faucon deserves his Su26.

If you don't know anything about Faucon's team - The Virtual French Aerobats, I highly suggest watching this: http://vimeo.com/7454012

AND here's another team:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgLJ6...eature=related

lol seeing a prop plane flying aerobatic routines meant for jets is quite funny (other than not realistic ;) )

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II (Post 363887)

lol seeing a prop plane flying aerobatic routines meant for jets is quite funny (other than not realistic ;) )

Jesus... :rolleyes: Never speak about things you dont know.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba5nvUzXG3E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSnDG...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA0Y0HiVVsU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fXl4xDV6-k

Enough?

Quote:

Originally Posted by faucon (Post 363918)

jesus... :rolleyes: never speak about things you dont know.

enough?

owned!