Official Fulqrum Publishing forum
Page 4 of 6 « First 23 4 56
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Technical threads (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=191)
-   -   Just How good is your PC?Windows 7 can tell you. (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=24130)

AndyJWest 06-27-2011 12:14 PM
Curiouser and curiouser. I've just updated the Catalyst drivers from version 11.5 to 11.6, and 'Windows Experience Index' claims to have detected 'new hardware'! So I tested again, and lo and behold - the graphics scores go from 6.4 to 7.9!
http://i958.photobucket.com/albums/a...enceIndex2.jpg

Evidently, it doesn't measure hardware at all...

Ze-Jamz 06-27-2011 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orpheus (Post 302905)
I'm sure you would see an increase, but (hat again) as a result of better use of what is already being piped through to the GPU... the HD bottleneck still exists, and no matter how much you upgrade your GPU, you would run into it eventually. Your GPU score would go up, but still be limited by the HD.

But yeah it's certainly not immediately apparent what the numbers actually mean, or how to usefully apply them to either hardware or software. Not a great system, but as a move towards a global 'shorthand' for system requirements, I think it's a reasonable first step. :)
Ok....:cool:

Ze-Jamz 06-27-2011 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJWest (Post 302908)
Curiouser and curiouser. I've just updated the Catalyst drivers from version 11.5 to 11.6, and 'Windows Experience Index' claims to have detected 'new hardware'! So I tested again, and lo and behold - the graphics scores go from 6.4 to 7.9!
http://i958.photobucket.com/albums/a...enceIndex2.jpg

Evidently, it doesn't measure hardware at all...
You shouldnt be at 6.4 with that GFX card mate...even with this inferior benchmark.. everyone here thats used it with 69## gfx cards gets 7.9

Igo kyu 06-27-2011 12:40 PM
My SSD gets a score of 6.8, while my HD 4870 gets 7.5.

It aint for real.

FS~Phat 06-27-2011 01:11 PM
Heres my effort and as you can see its not really representative of how COD will run. I have 4 GPU's and it only measures the performance of 1. Not to mention the game will run perfectly on my system once the code is optimised in the next 3 months. Its already very close to perfect performance wise, just the occassional hiccup stutter and sound issues that everyone is having.

https://blufiles.storage.live.com/y1...WEI.jpg?psid=1

ATAG_Doc 06-27-2011 01:24 PM
http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/f...y/Untitled.png

Barrakooda 06-27-2011 03:06 PM
1 Attachment(s)
mine

JG5_emil 06-27-2011 03:20 PM
slightly OT....if I added a SSD to my PC (apparently the HDD is the limiting factor according to that test) would I still get the full benefit by having COD on the SSD but Windows on the HDD?

Ze-Jamz 06-27-2011 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JG5_emil (Post 302987)
slightly OT....if I added a SSD to my PC (apparently the HDD is the limiting factor according to that test) would I still get the full benefit by having COD on the SSD but Windows on the HDD?
Yes if all your SSD is accessing is the game then it will be noticeably quicker..dont put windows on the same drive, your defeating the object a bit

hth

JG52Uther 06-27-2011 06:28 PM
My 4850 is scoring higher than some of the better cards here lol.what a load of b*ll*cks this test is!
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...Uther/perf.jpg


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:32 AM.
Page 4 of 6 « First 23 4 56
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.