Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Do We need more realistic humans in SoW? (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=2252)

BlitzPig_DDT 11-16-2007 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by igitur70
1) a pilot's body modelled, in ... the aircraft

And get in the way of the guages so you can't see them. No way. Leave the insides just as they are now.

You NEED the guages, but you ARE the pilot, so you don't need a second one. Look at your own arms if you really want to so badly.

Blood_Splat 11-16-2007 03:33 PM

I just don't want ghost town like airfields anymore.

BlitzPig_DDT 11-16-2007 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BSS_Sniper
I think whats more important than the visual "more real" pilot are the effects incurred by certain maneuvers. For instance, the unrealistic negative g pushover that seems to be so popular should incorporate an aneurysm along with it. Heck, it should kill you. lol Read about any pilots that did extreme neg g pushovers and they'll also mention that they NEVER wanted to do them again. It hurts, A LOT!

You guys really get on a roll, don't ya?

So I guess outside loops would be IMPOSSIBLE then as people couldn't continue to safely fly, IF they even survived it.

Col. Stapp survived 46.2 negative Gs, went through total red-out, was just barely concious, burst all the capilaries in his eyeballs, and was blinded for about a day or so, but his retinas did not detatch, he did not suffer an aneurism, and he did not die.

We will never see that kind of negative G in flight (that was done with a rocket sled designed for testing the effects of Gs on the human body), so we don't have to worry about dying from it, no matter how well it's modeled.

But just as with the endless blackout-riding, there needs to be fatigue modelling to keep things from getting too out of hand.

igitur70 11-16-2007 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlitzPig_DDT
Quote:

Originally Posted by igitur70
1) a pilot's body modelled, in ... the aircraft

And get in the way of the guages so you can't see them. No way. Leave the insides just as they are now.

You NEED the guages, but you ARE the pilot, so you don't need a second one. Look at your own arms if you really want to so badly.


I'm afraid that someone has decided it for you, kid :

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/viewtopic.php?p=3095&highlight=#3095[/url]

Never thought about being polite ? It may help you in your life.

BSS_Sniper 11-16-2007 06:13 PM

I'm glad they are going to implement fatigue and that DDT isn't a dev. :P I wouldn't want to have The hulk flying 190's doing outside loops and turning this any more into an arcade that it already is. BTW the G restrictions on ww2 aircraft are on avg +5, -3 to +6, -4. I've seen the bogus -g push overs that should snap wings, cause structural damage and/or hurt or kill pilots.

Please don't reference an extreme example as it doesn't apply here or to the avg pilot in an aircraft. I'm relying on my flight training and job to comment on little things like this. Thx :)

BG-09 11-17-2007 08:52 AM

Boys, I want o add some more thing to the topic:

WE NEED CIVILIANS!

Women, childrens, and men runing arround the cities when bomb attack begins. They must walk on the streets and scream...for more realism.

I was looking in uTube a film when P-47's are straffing civilians with 50 callibers, they were shooting at horse carts and civilian automobiles and civilian trains! Such a butchery...it is a war simulator? Or I am wrong...

More blood more fun...is this the reality?

Hm....


BG-09

revi 11-17-2007 11:57 PM

I would love :
* to have an LSO bring me safely onto a carrier deck or give me the go around because I'd not got my speed right.
* some aircrew around the planes, maybe pulling the chocks or sitting on the wings of your P47 taxiing to the runway - airfields are lifeless without people
*some sexy broads in uniform


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.