![]() |
Quote:
Spitfire Mk. I Spitfire Mk. I Hea... (more was not displayed in the menu) Spitfire Mk. Ia Spitfire Mk. IIa |
Quote:
so having E3 in BOB and not having E1 and E4 is very odd decision.....also but like I said...I hope Oleg will introduce E1 and E4 soon after initial release...really hope so.... |
Quote:
Oleg got my email after all! :lol: |
Salute
The problem with trying to model an E4 as well as the E3 is it would require the model be redone, since the canopy and glass and some other details are different. I am surprised Oleg didn't model the E-1. Drawing of E-1 and E-3: http://www.airpages.ru/eng/draw/me109_2.shtml Drawing of E-4: http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/8...09e4bigvi8.jpg http://www.worldweapons.eu/2-Aviatio...E-4%20(rc).jpg |
No, a 109 produced as an E-3 and got its MG-FF replaced with MG-FF/M became an E-4.
Wich canopy Maddox would use in a -1, -3 or -4 is totally unimportant. During BoB both canopy versions were used in all three armament variants. |
Quote:
|
Or "Spit Mk1 Hear! help me get this broomstick out of my arse!"
|
Quote:
As for all the "Why the E-3 and not the E-4?" I'm not seeing it. As near as I can tell, they are the same plane, with some differences in the internal fittings, and sometimes, but not always, a slightly different canopy, which means it requires both a new external 3D model, and a new internal 3D model. Making the E-4 is just going to tie up the 3D modelers for making a plane that's just like the other one. I'm not seeing the price/performance ratio here. |
I'm actually with Tree here. I believe Oleg will have E-4 - and I'll go further - I believe he'll have an E4/N.
JG26 for example, fought the Battle of Britan with mostly E-4's (all E-3's had been given up in refit), a few E-1's for some of the Enlisted pilots and some E-4/N's. Only a few Geschswader had the E4/N in inventory as it requires 96 (vs 87 octane) fuel. E-7's with drop tank capability don't show up until Novemeber, but I guess that doesn't mean they can't be there. BTW, sometimes even E-1's had E-4 canopies. Just because you have not seen it in screen shots, doesn't mean it won't be there. As Frankyboy said earlier, there is no standard Bf-109 for all Geschwader/Staffeln in July-September 1940. I like the later E4 canopy better - as with this FM I'd prefer the armored glass considering most RAF will be shooting rifle caliber ammo (even though I imagine I can see better in the older canopy). More than anything else, it will be cool to check them both out. There was a panic attack a few weeks ago about the Spit Mk IIA. Now that the beta reviews have been posted this week - we find the reviewers actually flew one. Reading through all the forums lately, the mood is often smells more of Hyperventilating 7th graders than RAF and Luftwaffe pilots about to go head to head in one of the greatest air battles of all time. Ahhh... the excitement of it all. Even if I don't get an E4/N - I'll still won't be breathing in a bag in the head. It's all like Christmas to me. S! Gunny |
Quote:
Just change the armament code from MG-FF to MG-FF/M. And the MG-FF/M is already included in CoD for the Bf110C-4 & C-7 ! My suggestion would be to skip the E-3 totaly (CoD is still not Gold i guess). And than later release an E-1. An E-1 would need external and internal work! The later canopy cuold be made for 109E versions in possible MTO or easternfront scenarios. For the BoB E-1, E-1/B, E-4, E-4/B would be the perfect setting IMHO. The now selected E-3s are a little bit questinable :) But anyway, the difference between firing a mineshell or not is perhaps not so huge : D the E-3 has still canons ;) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.