About to Tecnical advantage

Tecnical advantage.... ???




Erich Hartmann: 352
Gerhard Barkhorn: 301
Günther Rall: 275
Otto Kittel: 267
Walter Nowotny: 258
Wilhelm Batz: 242
TheoWeissenberger: 238
Erich Rudorffer: 222
Heinrich Bar: 220
Heinz Releer:220
Hans Phillipp: 213
Walter Schuck: 206
Antón Hafner: 204
Helmut Lippert: 203
Hermann Graf: 202
Walter Krupinski: 197
Antón Hackl: 190
Joachim Brendle: 189
Max Stotz: 189
Joachim Kirschner: 185
Werner Brandle: 180
Gunther Josten: 178
Joh. Steinhoff: 176
Gunther Schack: 174
Heinz Schmidt: 173
Emil Lang: 173
E.W. Reinert: 169
Horst Adameit: 166
Wolf D. Wilcke: 161
Gordon Gollob: 160
Hans J. Marseille: 158
Gerhard Thyben: 157
Hans Beisswenger: 152
Meter Duttmann: 152

I tested. I could not "crank" the spitfire in negative G and I tried a lot. In fact i could not experience more than -2.0G in the Spitfire. The Focke Wulf is relatively easy to "crank" in negative Gs.

The Focke Wulf broke at -3.8G~-4.0G. I could not anchieve more than -2.0G in the spitfire, maybe if i trim the spitifire negative i ll. I ll try later. In principle appears to me that spitfire has much better G endurance in 4.10. Why? Ask TD.

I did not tested other aircraft, but i guess that i ll have much more surprises. Kwiatek, what you expected to me observe while trying negative g's?

Certainly "was not" technical advantage, Mustang.

:rolleyes:


LOL


SEE 3m 30s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFl8X...ayer_embedded#!


.

Yes, Mustang. The allies won the war. They have to win in IL2 too, always. Spitfire is the perfect project, no compromisses. :rolleyes:

You just said that the Spitfire could pull fewer negative Gs. This probably has a lot to do with lower average speed and the nose-up trim tendency of the Spitfire. What has that got to do with G endurance? If you could get the Spit to pull 3-4 negative Gs it would break as well. All it means is that an FW-190 can escape more easily in a bunt as long as the pilot is careful. That make sense?

Ok. But how about the positive g's? Check the messages before this one. However i do not tried to trim the Spitfire to verify if it can go to more negative G's yet. Appears it had some positive trim on take off/start.

Dunno, didn't read that far back, haha. Does sound odd, but it doesn't mean it is wrong in principle. I don't know what either aircraft was stressed to achieve off the top of my head.

Have a read through this, Ernst. EDIT: In fact you posted in that thread, you've probably read it all already.

I just tried the negative g's because Kwiatek asked me for. Certainly he asked because he wanted that i observe something myself. But he do not come back to explain what.