![]() |
Quote:
Try reading my last post. Aviar |
Aviar, would it be:
Forest=3 Forest=4 ? |
S!
I reverted back to Forest=3. Finnily enough Forest at 3 has LESS effect on FPS than on 2 for some reason. |
Quote:
|
I'm gonna sound like such a noob but I only bought 1946 last week... Long story. First impressions are.. where do I start!? It's huge! I'm gonna need years with this so it's ok Oleg, take as long as you want with SoW!- I'm joking- (I was beginning to wonder if SoW stood for Sick of Waiting....).
Back to the noobishness... In the conf.ini is 1 better than 3 or is it the other way around? and what effect does changing the video options in game have on the conf.ini, if any? Thanks |
3 would be better, demand more of your system:grin:
|
Just for saying thanks too
thank you for your game, which is always fascinating Thank you for your answers on the forum. For me IL-1946 it's the best plane sim, and SOW are just the frosting on the cake ;) thank you for the work accomplished |
Quote:
|
S!
Actually Forest=3 has less impact than 2 for some strange reason. I tested this on a friend's rig that is a Pentium 4 at 2.7GHz and a nVidia 285GTX. Used same map (Kuban) and flew over Novoryssiysk with FPS counter on. 2 made a hit on FPS but 3 almost none?! |
Quote:
The main issue with Forest=3 , as stated above, is that certain tree objects become invisible, especially around runways, which can kind of ruin your day and is very annoying for mission builders wanting to "decorate" airfields. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.