![]() |
Quote:
Well if it is in next patch then we only have between now and forever to wait ... if its in a future patch we may as well expect to be playing the new SoW :P |
I am using the standard version of Saitek X-52. The non-pro version does not offer adjustable input curves, and the default curve produced by the joystick is actually non-linear but exponential for pitch and yaw - a design feature that I can not really understand.
I personally would love to fly with fully linear control settings for pitch and yaw - and if I had rudder pedals, that too - on twist handle, linear response for rudder is untenable. Getting the control response to feel linear (or close to - there's actually a slight logarithmic decrease in my settings toward the middle) requires a bit of trickery, though: Code:
[rts_joystick] As you can see, I manually entered these values into conf.ini, because the in-game interface didn't accept values larger than 100. This setup increases the sensitivity of the stick's by default "limp" center area, bringing it closer to linear response, while keeping the area immediately next to deadzone slightly less sensitive than linear (but more sensitive than the default curve of the stick). As far as I can tell, the default control curves for pitch and yaw on this stick correspond with these settings used with a linear control curve joystick: 1X=0 1 4 9 16 25 36 49 64 81 100 0 If I now want a completely linear output from these inputs, I would want to insert these values in the conf.ini: 1X=0 199 180 163 148 135 124 115 108 103 100 0 in other words 1X=0 (100 + 10^2 - 1) (100 + 9^2 - 1) (100 + 8^2 - 1) ... (100 + 2^2 - 1) (100 + 1^2 - 1) This will cause the Saitek X52 with it's non-linear control curve to behave as a linear control curve in IL-2. With my earlier stick, a Saitek Cyborg Evo with linear control curve, I used pretty much the following curves for pitch and yaw: 1X=0 33 66 82 95 97 98 99 100 100 100 0 and the current curve is basically this, but adjusted for the strange actual input curve of the X-52. I hope someone can find this post useful for setting up their X-52 for IL-2. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Never really understood why people go, 'yeah, 100s all the way, that's how to fly'. Depends on stick, depends on flier. MSFFB2 and CH sticks are utterly different in feel and throw length, for example. As long as you can hold the bead steady on an engine, and don't spin out in turns, then you're right. |
Quote:
Q: - curves: Well, can't we use the pro software then? - non linear: How do you know? Quote:
will try thx. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well, after some more testing i was wrong, all 100 is way toooooo sensitive at the center, so modified my curve, and right now i found a good setting like that
1X=0 40 54 63 69 77 82 87 91 96 100 0 1Y=0 40 54 63 69 77 82 87 91 96 100 0 still tuning to find a better response... |
Quote:
I thought you were saying, that by the ability to adjust the stick sensitivity, some ppl can make their planes behave like F16s. |
I thought this was a silly topic until I started playing with the 190 last night :). The roll rate compared to planes I had been flying REALLY threw me off. I chose to just learn to adapt to the plane rather than change my joystick settings, but I could see someone having a special setting for each plane thus utilizing the hardware to make the adjustment.
Splitter |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.