This works for fuselage mounted bomb racks, what about the bending relief that you get with wing-mounted bomb racks? You now have two masses attached to either wing which act to reduce the total bending moment at the wing root - i.e. the acceleration x mass forces act in the opposite direction to the applied aerodynamic load. Do you intend to increase the G-limit for those cases or just leave them the same? Just asking.

I'm going to ignore the CofG movement with the added mass - that's different for each plane and probably much more than you intended to consider.

W.

Thanks for the updates, TD. I have to say that I'm really impressed by the new feature of structural G limit. Your incoming patches will surely make IL2 a brand-new game! You guys are making history!

My question:

Is there any chance for you talented guys to incorporate jager Fw-190As in one of the incoming patches? All the Antons we have now are jabos, which are supposed to do ground pounding works and only have good performance below 1000 meters.

Where did you hear that?

Very nice DT! Keep up the good work and do not grow weary, I'm looking forward to this, as are many others. Your work is appreciated!

А планируется ли добавление ранних Bf-109 , Ju-87 ,Bf-110 в последующих обновлениях ???

@ DiO

Not at this moment. As you have seen in the current update there are fundamental issues to be sorted out, so that further sub-types of already existing planes aren't exactly high on the priority list.

S!

Interesting this G-factor. Are the G-limits differentiated in planes? For example Fw190 had stronger wings in later versions etc. And for me when looking at the video..the bombrack would break before the plane would. A 500kg bomb would rip itself from the hooks.

Another interesting thing is this g-limit lowering. Modern planes have strain gages measuring the level of strain on critical components of the plane. These planes pull over-G etc. but their G-limit does not drop because of this. It takes some time to build fractures and cracks etc. that would hamper the plane. The over-G causing critical failure would need to be very sharp.

But nevertheless, a very interesting feature. I really am interested in this and how it is implemented. Will there be documentation of this with patch release?

Flanker, as written in the description, each plane will have its specific G-limit defined.

There will be a very similar and detail guide in PDF as with the 4.09 patch.

S!

Thanks mkubani :) Must have missed it in all excitement ;) Why I am interested in this G-limit is because of my work with military jets. We do follow the G-limits, strain etc. so some grasp on it ;)

WOW Thanks very much for keeping updating.
 

I am a il-2 fan from China. So you don’t mind me translating this post into Chinese? If not I will post the translated version in inSky forum. www.insky.cn/bbs/, which is a non-commercial flight simulator forum.
Besides , a few personal comments:
1 I believe the G feature is critical for an ideal FS and I think the model in 4.10 is very good.
2 Do you have plan to include the F2G “super corsair”? I think this fighter will be very interesting to fly, with superb climb rate and bubble canopy.