Yes I own it and no it's not visually MILES ahead, are you just jumping on the CoD bashing bandwagon or have you actually played it? :rolleyes:

i have to add something to this talk, simply you cant compare very different sims just by graphic comparison, i know you want the best graphic and the devs should consider it when they program the FM,physics,damage model,collision model and so on, but still.WOP is arcade compare to COD,there is no feel fo detail except SFX,which is nice btw,damage model is very simple and mostly just graphic, FM also very simple and felt strage to fly,and so on.Same lack of proper wider campaign as in COD :(.I rather have a noch down graphic in COD,if they add hit boxes for trees and buildings,radar towers and so on,thats really important and clouds proper ones, and if the manage to keep the same graphic and framerate it will be the best sim, wish for better campaign with planes resuplies and chain events,to influence the other mission etc.

I wonder why they even cared to put an epilepsy filter in game in the first place even tough most players are obviosly blind anyway.....

Yes I play them all and they are all good in different things. WoP has the best graphics of the bunch.

This thread is only about graphic comparison.

Edit: Actually it's only a scenery graphics comparison...

ok ...but this thread il labeled 'CoD vs some other sims that model Kent'... so we are simply comparing different games just from 'aesthetic' point of view, and how the scenery is differently represented by each of them.
Correctly, how many had previously pointed up, we can not comparing this products in terms of FM/DM, or other peculiarity specific of a Flight Simulation.
They are simply different in their being! they are created with different commercial pourpose/targets.
So, please don't fire up when someone express just an opinion!
;)
Have a nice day

I'm not jumping on anyones bandwagon, I'm with mysticpuma on this one.

I own and play lots of flightsims (my first "flightsim" was "Interceptor" on the Amiga) and as a flightsim fan I don't get the rivalry between the "factions".
I loved IL2 and really hope that CloD is going to be replacing IL2 someday.

As I said, IL2 and CloD are superior sims i like very much, but IN MY OPINION WoP has far better gfx (except the planes/cockpit).

I play all three. I like all three. For some reason or another.

Sorry, I didn't mean to sound rude, because I'm not ;-)

Another WIP for autumn.

A different way to considere the landscape tiles for a sim. I don't say it's better or worst, but actually i don't like at all the CoD landscape (colours and textures).

RoF autumn with DX9.
http://www.150gct.it/users/150GCT_Ve...0__21_6_25.jpg

Nop mate, I'm with u at 100%, I was referring to others...:grin:
I think this forum is great and developpers should be gratefull to our constructive criticism; I would like my opinions would be taken into account just for whats they are, just opinion; not as the intention of imposing something on someone.

No, it's called an opinion, no need to be offensive :rolleyes:

As above, it's pretty pointless arguing it as people will have different opinions.

Ah so you do understand it's an opinion, why then be offensive and call people who do not share your opinion blind?

In my opinion CoD has far more realistic graphics and thus better.

We can agree to disagree I'd hope...