![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wonder if they are still friends, that would say a lot about that situation. :)...yep I hope BOS does well too, we need developers |
Quote:
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8 Asus PT6 Motherboard 6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600 Asus GTX580 Direct CU II 60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it 500gig HD Dual Boot Samsung 32"LG 120hz MSFF2 Joystick Cougar Throttle Saitek Pro Rudder pedals Voice Activation Controls Track IR 5 ProClip And I have: Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 @2,33 Asrock G41M Mainboard 4 Gb Hynix DDR3 Hitachi HDD 1Gb + Seagate 250Gb HDD Acer 17'' (3:4) CH Fighter Stick X52 Throttle VKB rudder pedals :) Enough for RoF, but far not enough for that crappy CloD. |
Quote:
When Stalingrad had its name changed to Volgograd the city officials got a telegraph saying: new name is accepted. Josif Vissarionovitch Volga:grin: |
...
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Larry69 |
Quote:
http://flightsimcontrols.com/ |
Thank you SlipBall!!
|
Quote:
your main rig is very very similar to mine except that your GPU is better and you don't give us the resolution you are running or your in-game settings. Mine are 1680 x 1050 and hammering 60fps (because of V-synch on) in flight, min 40 in dense combat and never below 30 around concentrated objects, usually higher. My settings are generally High with a few ground shadows/grass/building settings turned down because they are a big drain and unnecessary in a combat sim even if I were doing combat at 200 feet over London (and who needs to see the doorknobs anyway?). If your rig won't run CoD you are probably demanding too high settings. You may want the max settings and I believe there are still some issues with CoD graphics but it is completely playable if you lower your sights to just damn good graphics instead of the ultimate. On the other hand, if for various reasons you have placed yourself in the 'I Hate CoD' camp or are a fervent pro-777/anti-1C simmer then I guess nothing will persuade you to try it again but I genuinely believe it's your loss. |
COD's code certainly wasn't crappy, in fact its very good, it was just unfinished, and unoptimized. Team Fusion's work is proving that in spades. Its just unfortunate that the code took sooooo long to develop, and was forced out the door before it was ready. Understandably the investors ran out of patience.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.