Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Friday 2010-12-03 Dev. update and Discussion (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=17538)

janpitor 12-10-2010 08:16 AM

The in game maps can be placeholders for now. I dont think there are too large towns after seeing olegs huge passion for details and precission

CrazySchmidt 12-10-2010 08:39 AM

Looking forward to everything, expecting nothing.

My philosophy on life.

Cheers, CS. :D

[URU]AkeR 12-10-2010 09:27 AM

Maybe the towns are right size, but the rest of the land is smaller? I mean if map is not 1:1 scale, then towns would be reduced too much in size to a point it doesn´t resemble the original town. Or if you keep the original town map in small scale you would have small toy houses.

Sutts 12-10-2010 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [URU]AkeR (Post 203518)
Maybe the towns are right size, but the rest of the land is smaller? I mean if map is not 1:1 scale, then towns would be reduced too much in size to a point it doesn´t resemble the original town. Or if you keep the original town map in small scale you would have small toy houses.

I believe Oleg has confirmed that the map is 1:1 scale. It is the shape of the towns that is wrong - showing evidence of post war expansion. They haven't just been scaled up.

[URU]AkeR 12-10-2010 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sutts (Post 203520)
I believe Oleg has confirmed that the map is 1:1 scale. It is the shape of the towns that is wrong - showing evidence of post war expansion. They haven't just been scaled up.

Thank you for the reply Sutts, its hard to follow ALL the posts :grin:

Hecke 12-10-2010 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klem (Post 203439)
Hecke, a good question.

I know this isn't the place for it (there are at least two other threads running on GPUs and System specs) but you might like to see this....

http://videocardz.com/27861/latest-r...nd-6970-rumors
6950 competes with GTX 570/480 and is priced similar.
6970 competes with GTX 580 and is priced similar.


and
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...php?t=18216134
Gibbo: "They are here though. "
and:
"I can't speak for our competitors but we won't be running out and we shall be aiming to be the most competively price on the 6900 cards. "

Looks like AMD may well keep to their revised release date of 25th December.

Of course we won't know the truth until next Wednesday, 15th. From the leaked and general hype I'm expecting the general performance order of play to be :-
6990 dual
580GTX dual
5990 dual
6970 single
480GTX / 6950 (not sure which) singles
5870 single

<switching to the GPU thread>

Thank you for these links. What would you go for? I never had ATI but this time I would maybe go for them because I think that more VRAM could make a bigger difference due to the fact that the textures in BoB have high resolution.

satchenko 12-10-2010 06:58 PM

Bob
 
No update today ? :(

Wutz 12-10-2010 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by satchenko (Post 203730)
No update today ? :(

Nope no up date for you, for the rest that can read there was.

http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...ics/aetsch.gifhttp://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...Comics/244.gif

satchenko 12-10-2010 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wutz (Post 203740)

Sorry, my english is not good.
I dont see update today....

PilotError 12-10-2010 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by satchenko (Post 203747)
Sorry, my english is not good.
I dont see update today....

It's not been made a "sticky" yet, so it is half way down the page.

If you still can't see it, here is the link;

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=17629


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.