I don't even have a box.

Hehe either you're screwed, or you'll just have to take what comes.

:grin:

Hood

Ah I see where I confused you..

when I said

'on the box'

I should have said

'on the box and/or official advertisements'

For example the 1C or ubi web advertisements, magazines, etc..

All in all the point that your missing here is that 1C and or Oleg can not be held responsible for something they said in an interview about the status of the game at the time of that interview. Even if they didn't go out of thier way to point out that 'things may change' between what he says now and the end product, in that all adults know that goes without saying

Also note there is more listed 'on the box' (or where ever you got it) than noting an internect connection is required..

Hope that helps!

S!

AoA, as correct as you are, at no point were such statements retracted. It's not that people are pretending they were misled: they genuinely believed that if they were told X would be in the game with no retraction of statement, and it wasn't, there are clear grounds to show a major element of misleading information.

The box or the website will in no way list every single feature in the game. With your logic, one has reason to grumble for features users aren't told about!


The hard fact is that users should have realised the team were dreaming prior to release, but unfortunately any prominent poster here was hoodwinked.

There's the classic case of the woman who kills her cat by putting it in the microwave when it's cold. There's nothing in the instructions to say this would happen, so she wins her court case.
With the information in Oleg's interviews in mind (which weren't retracted) there's nothing to say the team can't be held responsible. They're the only ones responsible.

Agreed 100%

I seem to recall a post in this forum just prior to release that stated what did and didn't make it into the final release.. wrt what had been talked about over the years of development. If you missed it, sorry bout your bad luck! But even if that is not the case, since they were never official stated, listed, advertised, and or promised said features there was no reason, need, and or requirement to retract them.

Hope that helps!

S!

Yeah right....post a link to this alleged post before release. Anyone else but Ace remember this pre-release post admitting all the things that were broken or missing from the game? Probably just a dream Ace had...

First of all, this must surely be a dream of yours, because the team never went through the interviews retracting what features they had claimed would appear in the game.
I'm still waiting for the proof, AoA. Not some ridiculous: "it's there, look for it, good luck!" smarmy post. Genuine, concrete, proof.
Frankly I don't think you've been round these forums long enough in the build up to the game to provide any kind of objective stance on the development, and perceptions in the lead up to the release.

Indeed, surely any information from a member of the team classes any information as official? Without a disclaimer in any interviews to say that such information is subject to change, anyone has reasonable grounds to question.

Haha exactly right.

Anyone read Animal Farm? In a year Ace will be telling us it's a dream the game was so poor on release, and that actually it functioned beautifully.

Your wait is over..

Luither said this about a month before the RU release of CoD..

link http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=114

Hope this helps!

Sorry Phat.. didn't see this until after I posted the proof phill requested.. I wont post anymore on it in this thread, if he or force want to reply, please feel free to PM me! S!

That obscure post #114 in a response to furbs on page 12 of a thread is not a sufficient warning. He did not state "what did and didn't make it into the final release" it was very vague in a response to clouds.

Nice try though.