![]() |
Hi Kodiak, whilst Farber has done the vast majority of the work and it is a JG27 campaign, I am providing a large number of his enemy fighters for it (looking forward to that :) ) and I have been working with him on how this runs (though the buck stops with him).
Quote:
Quote:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y29...eselection.png Everyone else selects something else, therefore this means not everyone gets the menu option and have to be organised by the squadron leader. Only 3 or 4 people on RAF would even have this ability so their workload goes up and the pressure for their team to stay together in flight becomes very important. The information provided should be: 1. Location 2. Approximate numbers (30+??) 3. Height 4. Heading The flight lead has to then direct his crew to intercept. If this can be provided vocally then that is even better. Fighter Command had a WHOLE picture of the area via the plotting room bunker. This would receive all radar information from the RDF stations and observer corps, then scramble accordingly. @FARBER I imagine that for the purposes of campaign, that this event, ie "501 squadron scramble" could be handle by trigger. That way we start at the right time from the right place. I wouldn't want to be on some random patrol for ages because I don't know what's going on and then find ourselves 180 miles away with 1/2 tank of fuel left. Sorry to talk mission but I would suggest participating RAF squadrons being "At Readiness" with kites ready to scramble waiting for the off would be most realistic. 4 minutes delay This 4 minutes delay for response is interesting since information cannot be absolutely up to date. I'm trying to find out the delay between RDF station and reporting to the squadrons. 4 mins seems a long time, you could cross the Channel in that time. An alternative suggestion is that the flight leaders have a time delay between plot requests of a few minutes, so once they request and get feedback they cannot select again until that time has expired - this would add in the random factor for LW course changes and human error until visual confirmation, it would stop a flight leader from just hammering the button! This is why I love this stuff, because you learn so much about it all as you go :) I read that Ground Controlled Interception didn't occur until later because the RDF stations needed to scan the whole sky, therefore a squadron was scrambled and vectored to an interception position and that was it, though it was accurate. There was no 'within range of a station' since the entire coast was covered as one. It's really this we need to replicate. The difficulty would be that since we don't have the whole of 11 group in the mission then the Luftwaffe could 'slip the net' so we probably could do with a bit more reliability. Here's a nice overview http://www.radarpages.co.uk/mob/gci/gci.htm Quote:
|
Quote:
DANG! So the custom menu code is not available on dedicated servers? I must admit, I couldn't get it to work but I put it down to me being rubbish. Is there a way you can fire an event to the server to obtain that radar information? Please view my above post for further context, they are just ideas. |
About the 4 minutes delay. It appears to be bang on because the RDF data went through a filter station (where people examined the plotted information) before being passed to the FC bunker - this website is definitely worth a read.
http://www.ventnorradar.co.uk/CH.htm "The edited data was assembled as markers on a large plotting table and this showed the situation as it had been something like four minutes previously : since then the bombers would have flown about another fifteen miles" This is interesting too. Vector was only confirmed with the second reading. "Repeated plots became the direction of travel (vector) with the height and estimated number of aircraft repeatedly confirmed" CH was blind past the coast and then the OC was used. But was the delay resolved for the BoB??? "With the separate raids thus identified, the information was passed to an Operations room staff who could then make the tactical decisions regarding the deployment and vectoring of the defending aircraft, either those already in the air or presently on the ground, towards their ever moving targets. It was found that those best equipped to calculate the required courses were recuperating experienced pilots as they were able to better visulise the everchanging relationships between defending and attacking aircraft. However, once the enemy aircraft had crossed the coast the CH RDF could no longer detect them and then the Royal Observer Corps reports to the Filter Room became the sole means of tracking the enemy." "The system of having to use correction charts before reporting plots to the Filter Room contributed to the four minute delay and and sometimes of course the human factor introduced errors. This problem was solved by 'The Calculator'. Designed and installed by the Post Office ( which later constructed the Colossi computers for Bletchley Park) and using relays and uniselectors, this little known and uncelebrated early form of computer automatically added the correction factors to the input plots and displayed the results visually as the grid reference. The machine could also correct heights in the same way and a mechanically linked teleprinter could send the data by telephone line to the remote Filter Room. Ventnor was equipped with its first calculator in June 1940 and received its second in April 1941." |
Quote:
And just to make that absolutely clear I am not talking about using the whole width of the map if it doesn't reflect the number of players engaged. Right now that is simply not possible from the technical side as we don't see 128 player servers working and being filled to that point (plus a load of AI for the bombers which few people fly, anyway). The target zone would be limited to one of the areas assigned to the german Luftflotten (Luftflotte 3 = west of Seine, Luftflotte 2 = east of Seine). This way both RAF and LW would meet in one area and not play chicken with each other. Quote:
|
Sort of reminds me of the USL in that there was a known mission and both sides planned for it plus if someone knew what was going to happen though then it sort of spoils it for them.
Although it would be nice, I wouldn't expect Farber to have to tail a bomber with flaps down lol I can live without that total repetition! |
Never heard anything about the USL so I can't compare but essentially I envision a system in which the RAF will not know what the LW will attack until the action is underway. It's not that I want the LW to announce its targets before flying ... that would make the whole system pointless (all that will be known in advance is the area of operations - ergo whether the west or the east of the Channel map will be used).
Tactically the squadrons should be given not more than a general task but not told "you must do close escort for the bombers". All these considerations should be up to the squad. |
Quote:
Good Post Osprey. Heh 4 minutes hey? Good guess then. You guys can sit on the ground in readyness, no problem. |
Ok example for the mission menu:
Select red side then TAB->4 at moment the "radar" is not functional, menu at the moment is an example, so feel free to comment :rolleyes: for rest i must first read the posts above :rolleyes: Code:
using System; |
The menu works. I can attach myself to one of the radaroperators, Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta.
I can also see the request option. |
Any wishes for the captions of the menus?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.