Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Daidalos Team discussions (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=202)
-   -   Ideas for the next patches... (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=230422)

Fhechene 01-18-2020 07:31 PM

How about controlling all objects height?

Sita 01-18-2020 07:48 PM

i'm afraid that it could bring a lot of issues ... even with artelery it's not always work correctly..

Fhechene 01-18-2020 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 719974)
i'm afraid that it could bring a lot of issues ... even with artelery it's not always wark correctly..

That's too bad, then.
How about female voice packs for the female soviet squadrons? And maybe more squadrons, too. Like more ANS units or Belgian squadrons. Or whatever.

Thanks for reading and answering these post, BTW.

Avimimus 01-27-2020 12:19 AM

I thought I'd add a mention of one of my most desired features (for the past 15 years): A difficulty option for 'realistic morale' - which if selected would increase the chance of enemies attempting to disengage.

Example:
If an aircraft gets separated (e.g. no allied aircraft within 1000 metres) there would be a certain probability of the AI 'returning to base'.

Feasibility:
The AI already does a check for allied aircraft within 8000 metres before calling for help... so there is an ability to do this already programmed.

One could get more elaborate of course - considering the AI level, conducting a comparison of the number of allied and enemy aircraft, considering the relative ranges. However, I think the basic check for whether there are any allied aircraft nearby would do a good job.

An alternative (or additional) approach:

One could also add a probability of retreating once the AI has expended a certain amount of ammunition (e.g. a probability of disengaging after 50% ammunition used, and a higher probability of disengaging after 75% ammunition is used). This would increase the chance of the AI making a single pass instead of remaining engaged (as frequently was the case - either to increase chances of survival when bouncing larger formations - or simply because the attacking fighter lost track of its target and couldn't find it again).

There are many other minor features (e.g. incorporating gun jams for the Mk-108, MG-FF etc.) - however, this basic feature for making the AI be sometimes less aggressive is the thing I keep coming back to as the one feature that would most increase realism.

Sita 01-27-2020 08:41 AM

i'm not a programmer ... and for me it's even hard to imagine how it's all work ... i mean how AI work in Il21946 ... and i'm afraid that today we didn't have qualify enough specs to work with AI in il2 ...
on the other hand ... on aviaskins we have person - Leader AI he make inreresting modifications to AI paterns... and i hope some day some how we can include his work ...

Avimimus 01-28-2020 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 719986)
i'm not a programmer ... and for me it's even hard to imagine how it's all work ... i mean how AI work in Il21946 ... and i'm afraid that today we didn't have qualify enough specs to work with AI in il2 ...
on the other hand ... on aviaskins we have person - Leader AI he make inreresting modifications to AI paterns... and i hope some day some how we can include his work ...

I hope! I remember I looked at the classfiles to see if I could do it myself years ago (that is how I know that the check is for 8km)... but I lack the skill. I did manage to get it so that, if they AI saw the enemy - it would simultaneously go into an RTB & Evasive action cycle until it hit the ground though ;)

Anyway, on the AI note - if someone could track down ZloyPetrushkO - he made a good anti-aircraft gun suppression mod that was really neat. It doesn't work with the current version though. He still has a youtube account, an account on the DCS forums, and he has an e-mail address at gamedev.ru if you want to try talking him into updating it. :)

Sita 02-04-2020 08:00 PM

Guys... may be some one seen that book but in full version..
with all chapters ..

https://bulletpicker.com/pdf/Mine%20...20Part%203.pdf

Fhechene 02-07-2020 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 719999)
Guys... may be some one seen that book but in full version..
with all chapters ..

https://bulletpicker.com/pdf/Mine%20...20Part%203.pdf


This paper uses the 'Mine Disposal Handbook, part 3', as a reference.
You may want to contact the authors so they can help you

Sita 02-07-2020 07:34 AM

i copy adreses ... thanks) if i couldn't find pdf.. will try to write to them

Marabekm 03-05-2020 11:03 PM

This request may be a bit out there. But how about adding some new vehicle objects, used by the Aviation Engineer Battalions, and thus likely to be encountered on or near the airfields

2 1/2 ton, 6x6 truck dump truck variation -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2½-ton...2A2,3_dump.tif

6 ton, Prime Mover ---- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6-ton_6x6_truck

Caterpillar Road Grater --- http://usautoindustryworldwartwo.com/caterpillar.htm

LeTourneau Road scrapper --
http://usautoindustryworldwartwo.com/letourneau.htm

Asphalt Truck
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamon...asph._dist.jpg


Crash and Firefighting Trucks!!!! (These are definitely needed!)
Class 135 --- http://www.armyfiretrucks.com/135%20page.htm
Class 150 --- http://www.armyfiretrucks.com/class%20150.htm

As far as aircraft....
IMAM Ro 37 bis
Breda Ba. 65
Fiat Cr. 32
Caproni Ca. 109/110
Type 0 Observation Plane F1M2


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.