Originally Posted by CharveL (Post 323574)

But there are thousands of credible eye witnesses that swear they saw them. People who would know the difference between corporeal matter and not. And sightings didn't just magically start around 50 years ago.

How are they any less real or any different than aliens from outer space?

Is it the illusion of technological underpinnings that make sky phenomenon more appealing in the modern age than ghosts?

Originally Posted by Oldschool61 (Post 323577)

show the photographic evidence the mass sightings the scientific evidence.

Its called hallucinations.

Thats the same as saying there is an all powerful space god. where is proof

Originally Posted by CharveL (Post 323589)

Sure, you show me yours and I'll show you mine. ;)

Originally Posted by Oldschool61 (Post 323607)

There is tons of photographic evidence for UFO's as well as radar reports.

OK your turn show me pictures of ghosts and the all powerful OZ

Originally Posted by CharveL (Post 323660)

LOL!

Show me just one please. Out of the "tons" just pic one clear and unambiguous picture of an alien spacecraft.

I must admit, you have as much faith in your alien religion as I've ever seen in a religious person. It works out well though because faith doesn't require evidence, proof, or logic just a choice to believe.

Originally Posted by Oldschool61 (Post 323717)

Its your turn to show your scientific proof.

I never said that I thought UFO's were 100% real I have been saying that its more likely than not.

Still waiting on your proof of the all powerful OZ

Originally Posted by Oldschool61 (Post 324399)

Still waiting Charvel.....

Originally Posted by CharveL (Post 324453)

I'm looking forward mostly to the radar evidence, I mean, you can't fool that!

But the Proof Pictures with a side order of Credible Witness™ should make for some yummy bbq so I can't decide what to anticipate more.