Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   CoD Multiplayer (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=192)
-   -   SoWC:BoB Multisquad Campaign Starting (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=32402)

5./JG27.Farber 07-11-2012 04:06 PM

Easy tiger.

I just wondered which remedial you ment, it made me laugh thats all.

Ive just worked it all out above. ;)

Osprey 07-11-2012 04:27 PM

We used to call 'remedial' set kids 'chicken feeders' at our school, because they were too dumb to teach so were sent off to do farming stuff lol Oh joy....

Anyway, I see your edits, yes, a basic figure is better than just jumping in wholesale for the best types that's what I mean. LW squadrons had mixed types anyway according to Stienhilper, with the leaders taking the new planes. How you do this exactly is up to you but I would suggest a quick count of players, get a rough figure for E4's and tell each crew how many E-4's he can have. Then maybe give the couple of E3's to those crews with fewer E4's, and the rest have to take E-1's. The RAF wouldn't care if you were 1 or 2 over or under, it's just annoys us when we obviously see 90% of the best type which is BS. :p

5./JG27.Farber 07-11-2012 05:04 PM

We had those kids at our school and when we left and went to college they were doing animal handling and dog grooming. :-P

Your quite right about the mixed bag, except where units went to a new theatre, for example When 5./JG27 left the Ost Front to go to Afrika, in such cases the whole Staffel was fitted out.

Its certainly allot closer to what we have previously had. Ive also had another thought! The smaller squads can bunch together for "the count" to get different aircraft. - because the table isnt so hot.

Unless someone wants to adjust the table.

I honestly didnt think it was possible. :rolleyes:

OK we'll give it shot. ;) Obviously I cant control other people or Squadrons...


P.S. yes I am a stubborn begger.

EDIT1:

Hmmm how does this look? - a bit fairer on the smaller Staffel.

http://i1020.photobucket.com/albums/...craftdist2.jpg

Robo. 07-11-2012 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notafinger! (Post 443496)
One remedy I would propose would be removal of the mine shell. IMO it is probably over-modeled compared to the other 20mm rounds available and causes Hurricanes to just fall apart.

Oh yes, but as long as players don't use M-Geschoss only that's alright. As for the E-4 numbers I didn't mean to complain, just noticed 'unusually high amounts'. E-1 with custom ammo belt is just as deadly so I don't mind at all. Just for historical reasons, but I see it's difficult to accomplish.

Quote:

Originally Posted by notafinger! (Post 443496)
Fuel with the Bf 109 was really only a concern when they were going to areas around London and they had to fly close escort and spent hours zigzagging behind the slower cruising bombers. (...)

Very true.

Quote:

Originally Posted by David198502 (Post 443521)
there we shot down 4Hurris of No.501...

3 Hurricanes lost in that part of the fight, Teepee escaped unharmed and got CTD later on.

5./JG27.Farber 07-11-2012 05:33 PM

Ive made a mistake on the table, percentile targets are wrong. Ill put up another table very soon. :mad:

E1 - 40%
E3 - 8%
E4 - 52%

Theres about 4 Bf109 E4 missing from the table...



With regards to ammunition, you cant police it.

klem 07-12-2012 02:22 PM

Hi Farber

when will mission 4 brief be up?

Thanks

5./JG27.Farber 07-12-2012 02:52 PM

Just putting it up now. :-P

klem 07-12-2012 09:42 PM

RAF COs please see my Mission 4 post at HQ on the Campaign Forum.

Osprey 07-13-2012 08:18 AM

Rgr.

JTDawg 07-13-2012 01:46 PM

Rgr.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.