|
Quote:
|
Quote:
ACE your such a Hero fella... as much as I hate the phrase i think its quite Abt here 'Whatever' |
Quote:
You getting your panties in a wad such that you invoked the 'whatever' reply Or You admitting that the progressing of CoD is the same as IL-2 was, i.e. Quote:
If so, don't worry your pretty little head none! This is how most games go! Oleg will bring you flowers sooner than later! Just like he did with IL-2! |
Quote:
Your welcome...I'm always willing to offer some humor... As far as me being "one of those that didn't"...I believe that if you check the record you will find that my opinion was (and is) that these guys will give us the best game they are capable of...and I don't see any reason to change my opinion. You have always been the kind of person who enjoys trolling around in word games. You constantly quote people out of context, just so that you can set up an argument. |
Quote:
Run along now you jobsworth t*t |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You claim to understand that IL-2 went threw the same process that CoD is going through now So far so good? Than is it safe to assume that you also realize that most if not all new game releases go though a similar process? Where by process I mean most if not all games are released with bugs most if not all games make changes most if not all games have a lot of pre-release hype etc.. etc.. Assuming that is the case (i.e. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt) Why are you and people like you so upset? Especially those who are familiar with 1C's IL-2 track record!! A track record that consist of endless patches, add ons, and free updates for a game that is going on 10 years old Yet.. You and people like you act like CoD was made by the makers of SILENT HUNTER 5.0 Where support for SH5 was dropped just a few months after the release IMHO all this Oleg stood me up for the prom attitude would be well placed in the SH5 forums But not here! Granted I would cut those who are new to flight sims and never heard of IL-2 some slack on this But you? Someone who claims to know the history of IL-2! Nope, and you and people like you should be ashamed of yourselves IMHO! Your not helping one bit and most likly making Luithers job much harder than it needs to be! So in summary, I had a lot of worries about CoD early on, what with Oleg leaving and UBI's track record! My biggest fear being UBI would somehow force 1C to 'move on' and drop support for CoD like in the case of SH5. But what with Luther recent attempts to not only keep us informed but provide patches I am no longer worried and can see that the 1C approached to flight sims is still there, even if Oleg is not. |
Quote:
You said it all when you pointed out that it was speculation |
Quote:
|
Quote:
OK, but that was in reference to a previous comment by myself (sorry, I should have clarified). I will ask, can you provide proof of 128 players online working, or of DX-11 working in game? My CloD box tells me I can expect this. |
Quote:
Your the one making the claimed it does not support it.. Right? So how about you provide the proof that it doesn't support it? |
Quote:
I just hate seeing fanbois like yourself bitching about people moaning claiming you know everything..your pathetic...also dont claim to know me either, that's bad for you.. I bitch as much as big this game up so get yer facts straight.. Someone take this guy away, lock him up and put a nice big poster of 1C above his bed so he can play with himself, obviously I mean in the gaming context, right? |
Quote:
But I should not laugh at the bi-polar types.. my bad |
Quote:
Il tell you what..il leave you to play lol |
OK, sure thing:
cliffs of dover videos on youtube. None are in DX-11. Note: the game does not run in Dx-11. Support is irrelevent, as I pointed out, people are paying money under the impression the game will run in DX-11. Shall I post every-single video here to prove my point? No, let's be adults here Aces! It is much simpler to provide one video to disprove me, rather than one-hundred to provide my argument with even moderate levels of tangibility. 128 players online. Well, speaks for itself really. Take a look at hyperlobby or whatever online service people are running. I don't play online, so can't provide current screens, so I'm sure some could. As far as SUPPORT goes, my previous post in this topic supports my belief. On release, and within months, the game can just about be run with these numbers. Maybe it is supported, but playabality is another issue. Here's the topic: http://simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.ph...ml#Post3273039 But with internet lag, do we think this would be playable? It's speculative, there's no definitive proof; other than the fact that there aren't 128 players online in the same game, because you can't find 128 people able to play the game that well against eachother. I know you will say the game support's it, but please understand, Aces, that there is a fine-line between what can be achieved and what has been achieved. People looking for immediate results should steer clear of sims, but for someone who struggles (with highest settings and a great PC) running more than about 60 planes offline, 128 online is a pipe dream. Anyway mate, just my personal opinion. Not trying to split hairs, just saying that this game is never black and white. Some people have easy experieces with great rigs, others don't with similar systems. Is it the software or the person? Well, in the case of the game's release, mostly the former. And the release is key here, mate, as this is the box-art for the release. Note that this video is a while after release. At release, people were struggling to have more than a few videos in the sky at the same time on brilliant systems. enough from me! have a great weekend :-P |
Quote:
You love Oleg when he shows up on time to pick you up.. You hate Oleg when he shows up a little late to pick you up.. I get it! But what if he shows up late.. and brings flowers? That part I admit I don't know. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But Im still waiting on proof! So enlighten me here.. I have DX11 installed, Cod runs fine on my PC. Now.. Your claiming CoD does not support DX11? Right? Ok what feature is in DX11 that is not in DX10 that CoD states it is making use of? Because I have looked and I don't see it, so please help me out understand where your comming from on this. |
Quote:
How many members of this forum did Oleg stand up on prom night? Let it go guys! All them tears on your prom dress are just going to make it that much harder to return! |
Quote:
http://assets0.ordienetworks.com/ima...y_clapping.gif |
Quote:
What you are talking is nonsense: DX11 itself have backwards compatibility wit DX9 and 10, but CloD don't uses DX11 rendering. What was SOLD to us was that CloD in release will uses DX11 rendering. I'm a fanboy and love this sim, but the "release LIES" remains... MG fool us about AA, DX11, etc. I'm a fanboy but i'm not stupid. Now i can enjoy the sim, and believe that Ilya is doing the right thing now, but the release was a bunch of crap and lies. Let's move on, please... You can't even try to win this one, for sure... :rolleyes: |
Quote:
It says : SUPPORTING DX11!! Not using dx11! dx11 funktions can be used by this engine when implemented. |
Quote:
Well, let's clarify: DIRECTX 11 SUPPORTS DIRECTX 9 AND 10 RENDERING! CloD TODAY uses and support DX9 and DX10.0. CloD "supports" DX11? Well, enable DirectX11 in conf.ini and come back here... "Dx11 funktions can be used by this engine when implemented"... Yes, and in any game in the world... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The CoD engine can support dx11 funktions when they are needed by the graphics engine. They are not needed now! Clear enough? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe this will help? http://www.formalxchange.com/content...es-online-free There now you can re-coop some of the money you lost when Oleg did not wine and dine you on prom night! Think of it as your 1st step to recovery! Oh and feel free to share that link with you buds who allso feel cheated |
Quote:
|
It is one thing to disagree, but when you resort to naming calling and making insinuations about character, intelligence... and just about any other kind personal name calling in your postings you are out of line.
You can disagree without ever calling a dummy, fool, jackass, etc. within your disagreement. Couple you guys have been warned before. If the thread doesn't change it will be locked and some posters will enjoy not so nice actions. Time to cool off.. :rolleyes: You might want to think about breaking a bad habit now, before you mess up with the wrong person and get yourself into a lawsuit. Lawyers file suits very easily at no cost, and you a defendant will have to hire a lawyer to defend you. That can get expensive, even if you win... you lose. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdLJDuYOUpw |
Yea that post was pointless Nearmiss..I know what your trying to say but your interpretation of it?.....please
Lock the thread..easy enough m8 |
Quote:
Please... You know what is a graphic engine and a graphic API? Your statement about CloD engine is really nonsense... CloD now uses Dx9 and Dx10.0 rendering APIs. To use Dx11 "funktions" they need to be implemented, and ANY GAME CAN DO THAT! Your statement: "The CoD engine can support dx11 funktions when they are needed by the graphics engine" says NOTHING, please! It's not so hard to understand...:rolleyes: |
LoBiSoMeM...
Dude lets remove ourselves from this thread as I believe we are indeed smacking our heads against a brick wall and whatever we say cannot be understood by some.. We are indeed lowering ourselves to a very small level *Take my hand sir, let rock n roll* :rolleyes: |
Quote:
Let's go! :grin: |
Did a little search..
For the life of me I can not find where ubi or 1C said anything about DirectX-11 Anyone got a link? |
It's over AoA, they've left, trying to create some kind of superiority with this action.
I'll never understand why some people enjoy the wallowing in negativity, maybe to make their lives to appear more positive? Everybody, with a open mind, can see that CoD is fun for a majority atm, and with the next official patch it will be a serious sim, i believe. There is really no need to recall the ghosts from the release. |
Quote:
They left hand-in-hand! Says it all don't it? ;) Sadly though it is just an act.. They will be back Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
There are many posts where Oleg and Luthier tell us the game will support DX11 and there are many post where they also tell us that SLI and crossfire will work, As we know this was all crap. If you could only see past the Dev's butts you may be able to use the search button. Heres one post I found in all of 10 seconds.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=171 |
Quote:
And I don't like Tree attitude at all, because i'm a fanboy! But i'm not either blind, deaf or stupid... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::mrgreen: thanks Tree. Made my day. |
in 142 posts in this thread, has Luthier offered any clarification or is it just the usual crew battering each other with verbal shelling?
MP |
The usual, Mysticpuma, the usual.
|
Quote:
I promise I'll be gone when we get the >50%FPS patch. Atleast gone from these types of threads |
|
Quote:
Actually i like the game very much after the patch, the only thing i realy dont like is you and your shitty attitude. And please dont mean every men likes wearing womens clothes just because you do! But there is a big difference between us, me sees this 1c Product as an Game with many things still to do, many things not even started by the devs. I don't need this Game as somekind of religion or cult, like some guys like you and a few others in this forum. And actually i dont give a fart about the 1c Company they messed it up, they should fix it! But this Game has a great potential and i am sure it will become what the most of us expected when they bought it. If not, thats ok to me also, then i will fly WW1 or Modern airplanes. Games like IL2 or Clod are not important to me because they have a WW2 Scenario, its about virtual flying |
Quote:
Quote:
Considering that the post was made just under two years ago when DirectX 11 development was fairly new, maybe it was made before Oleg and Co encountered hard to solve problems? Maybe trying to implement DirectX 11 cause the massive delays to the release of this sim? Rather than a lie, could it be possible that Oleg was being over optimistic about the possibility of developing for it? Theres a thing, what other combat flight sim has Direct X 11 at the moment? As far as I know ROF and DCS A10 doesn't at the current time. Who knows? I sure don't! Cheers! PS I had a great time online the other week! Hope to see you online again soon! |
Yes me to Skoshi, ive been working on getting our own server up and running, trying to create a real nice map. No doubt I will catch up with you soon.
Myself and Skoshi are proof that you can disagree about many things, but ultimately still have respect and fly together quite happily whilst having heaps of fun. S! Skoshi. :grin: |
Quote:
|
I think Tree's earlier post quashes the joint 'efforts' of AoA and robtek.
It all links back to my first post (which this duo seem to forget) I'm not trying to be rude and seek some sort of endeavour of argument, but the point is clear: if it says DX-11 on the box, people will expect the game to be using those features. It is misleading. Aside from whether it is supported for implementation in the future, the team are in no credible postition to paste a list of features onto the box that can be supported. In reality, a shopping list of features are supported, but not implemented. That is misleading to any newcomers. The point is uncounterable. Now Lobi, as well, has posted tangible evidence to support this argument. In the face of statements, or quoted posts being taken out of context? It's clear we have taken the effort to support our claims. Have you? Please gents, it's clear there's a diversion of opinions. The childish point-scoring: 'hey, we beat you, let's talk to another user about how stupid these 'negative people' are' is just ridiculous :rolleyes: And I will be honest here, until AoA started posting more frequently, this atmosphere had largely died out of this forum. AoA mentioned All-Aircraft-Arcade/Simulations in a recent post: well I will be honest, as moderator there I received a terrible amount of complaints about his bullying, vindictive, argumentative attitude. Trooper has said the same on these forums too. It really is pathetic. Grow up and understand that people will have different opinions on issues surrounding the game. For a BoB sim, there are various areas that mean more to certain people than others. It's not too hard to understand. It's just ridiculous being name-called just for saying something constructive about how the terrain is wrong, or another feature. Luthier has already posted by saying this: "If we didn't listen to criticism, Il-2 would never in a million years get to where it did back in 2001. So please keep it coming. " now show me where he has said: 'if we didn't read a minroity of whining posts from members arguing against these horribly negative people, Il-2 would never in a million years get to where it did back in 2001.' have fun with that search! :cool: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You have jumped ahead with your logic, and assumed he was saying that about COD. LOL Tree you gotta do better than that. :rolleyes: Yet, to put the proverbial AXE in the stump. What counts is what we have now, and hopefully what we can expect. I say we are strictly on the hopefully side to that nowadays, since Luthier is doing what he can with his inheritance. |
For those who are reading this and not familiar with Tree_UK know that he has nothing good to say about CoD. Why he is so negative, well that is one for the Freudian types out there. We don't need to know why he is, only that he is. With that said this reply to his post is not to him, it is to those who are not familiar with his agenda. So with that in mind allow me to point out how silly his latest attempt is. That being that 1C, UBI, or STEAM advertised CoD as DirectX 11 game.
Lets begin Quote:
Yet, he only provided '1' link to '1' post by Oleg back in October of 2009, Some two years ago, and nearly a year and a half before CoD was released. That is to say during the development of CoD. As as all 'adults' can tell you, things can change between development and delivery. Also note that Tree did NOT quote what Oleg said in that post two years ago Ask yourself.. Don't you think Tree would have quoted it here if this was the holly grail of proof that 1C, UBI, or STEAM promised a fully DirectX 11 game? Well there is a reason for that, Tree is hoping you will not click on the link and simply read Tree's summary of what Oleg said as proof. Fact is any adult clicking on that link and reading what Oleg actually said will see that there is no promise that CoD will ultimately be a fully DirectX 11 game. As it does prove to us is that Oleg was looking into the differences between DX9, DX10, and DX11. So out of the 'many' this was the best Tree could find? Does that not tell you something? Quote:
Yet he posted none Does that not tell you something? Quote:
Why you ask? Well this is the typical approach of the neg-nuts when they know they don't have a leg to stand on. Their goal is to muddy the waters with a name calling and tangent topics in the hopes of taking the focus off the fact that they have not proof. Again, if your not familiar with Tree you may not have noticed this. But for those of us who have had to put up with his rants for the past few months they are easy to spot Quote:
Quote:
Now ask yourself.. Do you see anything Oleg said in that post that could be construed as a promise that CoD would be a fully DX11 game? I sure don't! Now ask yourself.. What sort of person would read that and conclude what Tree concluded? Does that look like something an 'adult' mind would read and conclude, or something a 'child' like mind would read and conclude? And by 'child' like I mean someone that has no real grasp on reality of PC games. In that most adults realize.. Most if not all software/games are released with bugs Things change between development and delivery So in summary As I pointed out, we received everything that was advertised (read promised) at the date of release. And below is a list of what was advertised. As you read the following, note, no mention what so ever of DX11 Quote:
http://shop.ubi.com/store/ubina/en_U...ctID.224108000 http://ubisoft-en.custhelp.com/app/a...mum-requiremts http://ubisoft.custhelp.com/app/answ...liffs-of-dover So, not sure where this DX11 'myth' comes from? It surly didn't come from any official 1C, UBI, or STEAM web site. Some of which are over 6 months old. Note I don't have the box version, so at this point I can only assume that it is mentioned there? I mean this myth would have to be based on more that what Tree provided above.. Right? Assuming it is mentioned somewhere, go back a page or two and I think you will see that robtek already covered it. |
Quote:
Told ya he would be back! :o |
Quote:
It's about time to DX11 rendering, or at least DX10.1...:( |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...251#post114251 |
Quote:
Not suprised really.. Allow me to bring you up to speed CoD was not advertised (read promised) as a fully DX11 game Therefore we have recived everything we that was advertised! Which explains why the neg-nuts have NOT posted a link to thier class action suit to get thier $50 bucks back.. Because they have no case Got it? |
Quote:
Not surprised really.. Allow me to bring you up to speed CoD was not advertised (read promised) as a fully DX11 game Therefore we have received everything that was advertised! Which explains why the neg-nuts have NOT posted a link to their class action suit to get their $50 bucks back.. Because they have no case Got it? |
|
Quote:
In that it sheds light on his view of the world, and why he is so upset Clearly Tree has no grasp on reality let alone the concept of how things can change during development and what is ultimately delivered. As a guy who writes software I can tell you that a lot of things are 'tried' during development don't always make it into the final product. At the same time things you never thought about at the start of the project make their way into the final product. This realistic view of the world is beyond most if not all of the neg-nuts in this forum It is a real Dammed if you do, Dammed if you don't situation with these neg-nuts For example, if you will recall during the past 6+ years of CoD development people were 'screaming' for updates on the status of CoD. So Oleg was kind enough to post from time to time the status of CoD. Now, years later these neg-nuts think that everything that Oleg ever commented on over the past 6+ year must be in the game otherwise they have been cheated. Such that you got to ask yourself why Oleg says anything at all! Well it is simple really Oleg, like so many of us, realize that these neg-nuts are the minority. That their whinning temper tantrums are the exception to the rule and have no reflection on the majority of CoD users. Oh sure these neg-nuts are the squeakiest wheels in the room, which in turn tends to make their ant hill appears as a mountain to the new comers. But within a few weeks of hanging out in this forum even the new comers quickly see them for what they are. So nothing to see here folks! CoD is no different than any other software that is released The difference between CoD unlike most games is still being supported by the developer and thus reciving bug fixxes Granted it is not at the pace to appease the neg-nuts, but the good news is 1C is not catering to the minority ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not one rebuttal to anything I posted.. Why? Because Tree knows I am right, and any attempt by him to try and spin what I posted will only highlight the fact that he's go nutting Thus his only recourse is to resort to name calling |
Tree at his best....
|
Quote:
You are frustrated with your life and need to jump here to defend some useless point of view in any topic you post. Nothing new! ;) |
Quote:
|
If you want DX11 so bad, then why don't you try?
Go to your Conf.ini file in your documents folder and change it from DX10_0 to "DX11_1". But I will garantee for nothing what might happen....:evil: |
Quote:
Well im assuming if planes in COD didnt had engines you would be fine with it. Nowhere luthier said "planes will have engines" he only said 20 flyables, he could be mining that if you drop them from altitude they would "fly". |
Quote:
Fact remains we got everything that was advertised |
You forgot to interchange the "You" and "I" in your post, LoBiSoMeM.
|
Quote:
thats not an assumption its a fact. |
Quote:
Fact is it does not work on minimum system specks for 'some' people And Fact is it does not work on systems that exceed the maximum specks for 'some' people Which says more about 'those' people and thier PCs than CoD |
Quote:
"Not true Fact is its not green for "some" people. Wich says more about those people and their daltonics than grass...." |
pupo, don't feed the troll please.
Ignore this guy. |
Quote:
|
hey an old time neg-nut!
Welcome! |
Quote:
Were we ever told tree-collision had been removed? No! We weren't. So were we to guess before buying that it had been removed? Along with many other features Oleg promoted? Of course development changes, but it is wrong to say that features will be included and then not to say that they have been removed. Aces, what is your goal? To say that what we were buying was only what was on the box and explixitly said? I take it, then, that you are the kind of chap who will read a sign saying : 'dogs must be carried on lifts' and assume that it means you need a dog in order to use it :rolleyes: NOTHING is black and white. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence will research a game before buying it, and if they read the development topics, they would be misled. Here, as I posted before, is the best example. The release videos. All filmed at 1/8 speed because the game wasn't playable at those settings. That is misleading, and for newcomers to the sim could entice them to buy it. It is false marketing. |
Quote:
And yes, many are name-calling now, but I do believe you started this one. |
Quote:
You like so many others tried to find something where Oleg, 1C, UBI, or STEAM advertised CoD is a fully DX11 game Only to come up empty handed and are now upset with the FACT that we got everything that was advertised.. AND MORE! Thus bursting the bubble that all your whinning arese temper tantrums have been based on |
Quote:
What's the matter bud? Your whole DX11 excuse you were trying to hang your hat on disappeared? You poor thing.. let it go bud! Before you bust something you need! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This so called proof There is a reason for that you know Because there is nothing to quote Nice try though! You get a gold star for effort |
Quote:
|
Wow! You're totally out of control Ace, I was actually sitting in front of my PC monitor chuckling at the ferocity of you're fanatic posts. Keep it coming, let it all out...also CloD is so broken that even all the game developers in the world couldn't salvage the code to resemble something even remotely close to a computer game, ehr sorry! I meant SIM of course. ;)
|
Quote:
|
For those who are reading this and not familiar with pupo162 know that he has nothing good to say about CoD. Why he is so negative, well that is one for the Freudian types out there. We don't need to know why he is, only that he is. With that said this reply to his post is not to him, it is to those who are not familiar with his agenda. So with that in mind allow me to point out how silly his latest attempt is. That being that 1C, UBI, or STEAM advertised CoD as DirectX 11 game.
Lets begin Quote:
Also note that pupo162 did NOT quote what Oleg said in that post two years ago Ask yourself.. Don't you think pupo162 would have quoted it here if this was the holly grail of proof that 1C, UBI, or STEAM promised a fully DirectX 11 game? Well there is a reason for that, pupo162 is hoping you will not click on the link and simply read pupo162's summary of what Oleg said as proof. Fact is any adult clicking on that link and reading what Oleg actually said will see that there is no promise that CoD will ultimately be a fully DirectX 11 game. As it does prove to us is that Oleg was looking into the differences between DX9, DX10, and DX11. So out of the 'many' this was the best pupo162 could find? Does that not tell you something? Now allow me to actually post 'here' what Oleg said at that '1' link pupo162 provided, i.e. Quote:
Now ask yourself.. Do you see anything Oleg said in that post that could be construed as a promise that CoD would be a fully DX11 game? I sure don't! Now ask yourself.. What sort of person would read that and conclude what pupo162 concluded? Does that look like something an 'adult' mind would read and conclude, or something a 'child' like mind would read and conclude? And by 'child' like I mean someone that has no real grasp on reality of PC games. In that most adults realize.. Most if not all software/games are released with bugs Things change between development and delivery So in summary As I pointed out, we received everything that was advertised (read promised) at the date of release. And below is a list of what was advertised. As you read the following, note, no mention what so ever of DX11 Quote:
http://shop.ubi.com/store/ubina/en_U...ctID.224108000 http://ubisoft-en.custhelp.com/app/a...mum-requiremts http://ubisoft.custhelp.com/app/answ...liffs-of-dover So, not sure where this DX11 'myth' comes from? It surly didn't come from any official 1C, UBI, or STEAM web site. Some of which are over 6 months old. Note I don't have the box version, so at this point I can only assume that it is mentioned there? I mean this myth would have to be based on more that what pupo162 provided above.. Right? Assuming it is mentioned somewhere, go back a page or two and I think you will see that robtek already covered it. |
pls somebody stop him....so we can carry on regularly....
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not getting upset at all. :cool: The fact is that the game won't run if you input the DX-11 command. lobi said as such. but that leads back to what you said about the game mentioning 'support' Jesus mate, I have said, can't you understand that the whole suggestion is that the game will be making use of the updated features of DX-11? (improved tesselation etc etc)? Of course you can read into it that the game 'can' make use of the feature for future installment, but game boxes don't generally list the features that will be made available. Could we drop the childish vendetta mate? I chat openly and enthusiastically with all here. Mostly it's banter, but you dissect everything and take it completely out of context. |
Can someone ban this Ace of Aces dickhead??
|
Quote:
Ah good glad I could help! S! |
for someone i dont know, you know a awsome lot about me doctor phil.
anyway. you are right. We never got promised this gmae to be fully funcional. we werent promised stuter free gameplay, we were not promissed dx11. this game is exactly as promised. you win. |
Quote:
Lets begin Quote:
Also note that pupo162 did NOT quote what Oleg said in that post two years ago Ask yourself.. Don't you think pupo162 would have quoted it here if this was the holly grail of proof that 1C, UBI, or STEAM promised a fully DirectX 11 game? Well there is a reason for that, pupo162 is hoping you will not click on the link and simply read pupo162's summary of what Oleg said as proof. Fact is any adult clicking on that link and reading what Oleg actually said will see that there is no promise that CoD will ultimately be a fully DirectX 11 game. As it does prove to us is that Oleg was looking into the differences between DX9, DX10, and DX11. So out of the 'many' this was the best pupo162 could find? Does that not tell you something? Now allow me to actually post 'here' what Oleg said at that '1' link pupo162 provided, i.e. Quote:
Now ask yourself.. Do you see anything Oleg said in that post that could be construed as a promise that CoD would be a fully DX11 game? I sure don't! Now ask yourself.. What sort of person would read that and conclude what pupo162 concluded? Does that look like something an 'adult' mind would read and conclude, or something a 'child' like mind would read and conclude? And by 'child' like I mean someone that has no real grasp on reality of PC games. In that most adults realize.. Most if not all software/games are released with bugs Things change between development and delivery So in summary As I pointed out, we received everything that was advertised (read promised) at the date of release. And below is a list of what was advertised. As you read the following, note, no mention what so ever of DX11 Quote:
http://shop.ubi.com/store/ubina/en_U...ctID.224108000 http://ubisoft-en.custhelp.com/app/a...mum-requiremts http://ubisoft.custhelp.com/app/answ...liffs-of-dover So, not sure where this DX11 'myth' comes from? It surly didn't come from any official 1C, UBI, or STEAM web site. Some of which are over 6 months old. Note I don't have the box version, so at this point I can only assume that it is mentioned there? I mean this myth would have to be based on more that what pupo162 provided above.. Right? Assuming it is mentioned somewhere, go back a page or two and I think you will see that robtek already covered it. |
what have i done :(
|
Quote:
Hahaha... no. Completely wrong mate. (unless you were satisfying my last point?) http://il2sturmovik.ubi.com/cliffs-o.../key-features/ New 3D engine – Latest-gen graphics engine with DX10 and DX11 API support. As I said. 'Support' can be taken into any context. I don't want to split hairs. As aforementioned, it is the same as the: 'dogs must be carried on lifts' sign. If you read it literally, it doesn't always fit the statement appropiately. Shall we just agree to disagree mate? You won't change my opinion, and proving me wrong is impossible, in the same way that proving you wrong is impossible too. |
Quote:
goodbye |
Quote:
http://il2sturmovik.ubi.com/cliffs-o...ion/index.aspx And note that no where does it say DX 11 |
Quote:
Quote:
I only wish you were aware of the FACT that most, if not all games (software in general) is released with bugs. That is to say it is unrealistic to expect there to be no bugs! Thus you being upset about that is.. well.. silly IMHO |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.