Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Obscure aircraft discovery goes on... (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=38911)

IceFire 03-09-2013 07:16 PM

I always thought the P-40Q looked kind of odd too..

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...2/27/P-40Q.jpg

The fastest of the P-40s but not put into production because it would take too much time to retool the production line. Apparently.

JtD 03-09-2013 07:25 PM

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-kKXozuOLfU...ar-640x508.jpg

IceFire 03-09-2013 07:27 PM

A uniquely Canadian UFO :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_VZ-9_Avrocar

EJGr.Ost_Caspar 03-09-2013 07:45 PM

http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/URG/xp62.html

Thats ugly!

IceFire 03-10-2013 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 499161)

Dear lord, that IS ugly :D

Treetop64 03-10-2013 08:26 PM

One of my favorite obscure aircraft
 
The Douglas Mixmaster...

...with DJ Jam Master Jay at the controls.


http://www.planeaday.com/images/2010...-1234S-006.jpg

The "slant" of the hangar is caused by the camera panning while tracking the aircraft fly-by during the exposure.



http://www.diseno-art.com/news_conte...ixmaster-1.jpg

This was an experimental medium bomber. It's performance was excellent and, after refining the design, would have likely been put into production had the war continued, and for the advent of jet powered aircraft...

zipper 03-11-2013 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treetop64 (Post 499273)
The Douglas Mixmaster...

...

This was an experimental medium bomber. It's performance was excellent and, after refining the design, would have likely been put into production had the war continued, and for the advent of jet powered aircraft...


SSSOOOOOO ... the B-42 Mixmaster lead to the B-43 Jetmaster ...

AND ... the Air Force bought B-45 Tornados.



PS. Both the -42 and -43 are in the Smithsonian. They are VERY imposing aircraft on the ground.

Pursuivant 03-12-2013 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treetop64 (Post 499148)
Who's brilliant idea was it to come up with naming a military fighting aircraft a "Fireball"...? o_O

I've always wondered that myself.

Although, except for that pesky N-G ban, I've always thought that the Fireball would make an excellent "Pacific 1946" plane to fly against planes like the J7W Shiden or A7M Reppu.

zipper 03-12-2013 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pursuivant (Post 499350)
I've always wondered that myself.

Although, except for that pesky N-G ban, I've always thought that the Fireball would make an excellent "Pacific 1946" plane to fly against planes like the J7W Shiden or A7M Reppu.


The structurally much improved F2R Dark Shark probably would have made it into service before the Fireball with all the problems the Fireball had. Though VF-66 was scheduled to be out to sea in Sept. 45 Fireballs had so many incidents/accidents in their next cruise in March '46 that operations were halted for modifications and limitations were subsequently imposed when wing cracks were discovered. The aircraft was finally withdrawn from reduced operations in 1947 after several structural failures leading to total losses, some fatal. It's unlikely the Fireball would have been combat operational for long if even at all.

KG26_Alpha 03-12-2013 08:27 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Only a proto but luckily it stayed that way :)


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.