![]() |
Hi Kris. Regarding the Starboard sidwe, the image I forwarded shows the lettering as O (then the roundel) them JX
It's the image with the group stood in front of the Hurri ;) Looking fantastic so far! Can't wait ;) Cheers, MP |
Quote:
|
Neil,
Changed the Starboard codes, also lightened the brown a few shades and changed the underside form a duck egg to more sky. http://s6.postimage.org/cja1vzwjl/Elkington_5.jpg http://s6.postimage.org/vcvuszurl/Elkington_6.jpg http://s6.postimage.org/y88xzuyrl/Elkington_7.jpg FF, looked in my copy and can't see anything?? |
Ktistorf, while I appreciate you are trying to make it look accurate....I think the third rivet from the wing Roundel, the one that is just below the parallel one on the opposite side, is in fact at-least 1mm off! I am disappointed with the level of realism you claim to be able to make!!!!
Yeah right! Seriously this looks fantastic. It's just so close to the profile supplied and looks brilliant! Looking forward to seeing it on a Hurricane on my CloD install very soon! BTW, when looking at Hurricane 1 skins, which Hurricane is the one the skin belongs to? I went into Quick Missions and chose a Hurricane, but none said "Hurricane 1" where previous skins had been installed? All I could find was a Rotol and a few others? Which Hurricane do I need to load this skin (when it arrives). Truly fabulous work. Also I must add thanks to larry69. I appreciate the time you spent making yours too. Kris does have a level of detail though that 'ramps' up visual beauty of the skin though. But thanks for the effort and time. Waiting patiently Kris, cheers, MP |
hurri skin
..it`s o.k, mysticpuma. i`ve admit, kris`s skin looks great! like every work of him!
larry69 |
Cheers Neil,
I will rename it from test and send it on. I will put on the .jpeg it's name but looking at the profile you sent me it fits the Rotol version. (but will go on all really) P.S, I agree with that bloody rivet being out of place.... **e-mail sent mate** |
Sorry.. I have to ask.
The markings.. are they correct? On one side, it has O@JX The other side has JX@O I brought this up about luftwaffe markings and have to wonder.. was this plane unique, or is this how british markings were set up? I would have thought if one side was O@JX, the other side would have to be the same O@JX. See the first pic in the following post to see what I'm talking about.. http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34324 |
Quote:
Cheers, MP |
Yes, I see.. I looked at a bunch of other RAF skins (I should have before posting :( )
I see that the RAF markings differ to the Luftwaffe's. RAF keep their codes in the front or rear of the roundel on both sides of their aircraft, while the Luftwaffe keeps their markings in order, ie.. O+JX would read O+JX on the other side. I learned something today, thanks. :) |
Quote:
No 1 Squ was one of those, the same goes for Nos 43 (FT), 76 (AL and NV), 128 (WG) and 134 (GO) RAF as well as No 1 Squ SAAF and as a number of others (don't have all my Hurricane refs here at the moment). There were a number of variants on the basic squ-roundel-individual scheme though. Some squadrons flew with the reverse order (Nos 312 (DU) and 527 (WN) for instance), and particularly in Africa a few squadrons flew with individual letter only. This is only for Hurricanes, Spitfires sometimes had the same phenomenon (see Kristorf's sig), other planes had other peculiarities. See the Whirlwind in my sig for an example. To sum up, you need references, preferably photos, to make an accurate skin. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.