![]() |
Quote:
Of course the Merlin XII and then 45 would have shown improved high altitude performance. |
Quote:
http://kurfurst.org/Engine/Boostclea...rese_nov40.PNG The already posted DB 601N chart does not show did, though it shows the effect of RPM increase at lower settings. Based on that it would be a reasonable estimate IMHO that the power output of the 601N above 4.8 km could be increased by 100-150 PS, for example to about 950-1000 PS at 7.62 km (25k feet) by increasing the rpm to 2800. As per Blatt 6 of the 109F-1/F-2 increasing the rpm to 2800 at FTH resulted in 10-15 km/h speed increase. http://kurfurst.org/Performance_test...1F2_DB601N.PDF |
A similar increase of RPM was permitted for the Merlin III (http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/attachm...4&d=1334674718, http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/attachm...5&d=1334674727), not sure about the date though. This didn't increase the maximum power but increased power of the 30 minute climb-power.
I think the benefit of increased rpm in the DB601 could be even greater if the propeller wouldn't be operated above the best efficiency at this rpm. Would be interesting to compare Merlin III vs. DB601A(a), Merlin XII vs. DB601N (old supercharger/new supercharger, Bf 109 E/F) and Merlin 45 vs. DB601E (Bf 109 F-4). |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.