| Sternjaeger II |
12-12-2011 03:39 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi
(Post 369497)
Fallout 3 is rubbish compared to stalker IMHO fallout 3 has about as much atmosphere as a crappy chick flick while stalker draws u into a bleak morbid world that no other fps except perhaps metro 2033 has ever done.
Typical the large company release a similar game and the sheep lap up there putrid product and the small company that bring something new to the table are forgotten about... The game industry is a load of rubbish unless your a large company only willing to put little in for as much as possible out.... Bah
|
I dunno man, Fallout 3 is very very immersive and above all playable again and again.. Stalker is more fascinating probably, if anything for the fact of the real scenario, the complexity of missions etc..
I would probably put it in the same category as Hidden and Dangerous 2: by far the best real time strategic game on WW2 commandos, and although not perfect it was immersive enough. The next game the guys developed (Vietcong) was even more immersive, but a 3rd chapter of Hidden and Dangerous would be a most welcome one!
Do you know what happened to the development team of stalker and why a sequel is not happening?
P.S.
It's funny how the market seems to saturate itself with the same genres at the same times: the WW2 wave has just gone, now we're in full post-apocalyptic swing and super war scenarios stuff (Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 4).. wonder what's next! |
