Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Proof that game runs OK on DUAL CORE! (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=22262)

SEE 04-28-2011 01:20 PM

Same here, very happy owner of a Min specs Duel Core E5400 - Win7/64 - 4Gb - GTS250 (512mb).

I have Grass On as the visuals are pretty bland set to 'Off' for Start missions and avg 42 fps with little or no impact on fps when I am in the air.

1280 x 768 60Hz

Nvidia Pre render 0 frames
AA X2
Vsync enabled

SSAO Off
Clouds Off

Model Detail - High
Buildings Detail - Med
Land Detail - Med
Forests - Off
Visual Effects - High
Texture Quality - Med
Damage Decal - High
Buildings Amount - Low
Land Shading - Medium
Grass - On
Shadows - Off
Roads - Off

Will probably get a GTX560Ti as my first upgrade option for future proofing any hardware ug's.

sigur_ros 04-28-2011 02:28 PM

Why surprised? Well known by now it is not multicore and uses only single core.

SEE 04-28-2011 02:44 PM

It's not so much about 'suprise', I think this thread mayhelp those running min specs machines, having problems and simply being told that its all down to their aging/weak hardware. There may be issues but not necessarily that their machine is just not up to anything other than cranking all settings to low or off. There will come a time when we will probably have to upgrade for sure.

Sokol1 04-28-2011 02:51 PM

Same boat.

Core 2 DUO E7300@2,67GHZ
4 GB DDR-2 800MHZ
Geforce 250 GT 1 GB

Due old CRT monitor limited to 1024x768 - 85 HZ (or 1280x1012 60 HZ). :(

SSAO Off
Nvidia Pre render 0 frames
AA X2
Vsync enabled

Model Detail - High
Buildings Detail - Med
Land Detail - Low
Forests - Very Low
Visual Effects - High
Texture Quality - High
Damage Decal - Medium
Buildings Amount - Low
Land Shading - Low
Grass - Off
Shadows - Off
Roads - On

FPS Counter = OFF <<<<< :) And no low level flys over London - the game objetive is other.

Playable and enjoyable game. The only major problem (appart all know bugs) is when very next to enemy bombers my guns sometimes "freeze" or only fire in short burst.

Sokol1

FAE_Cazador 04-28-2011 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sokol1 (Post 275193)
The only major problem (appart all know bugs) is when very next to enemy bombers my guns sometimes "freeze" or only fire in short burst.
Sokol1

Try to shoot for a second before taking off or before attacking the bombers: sometimes this stutter is a sound stutter, caused by loading the gun soundfile from HD for the 1st time. Once in RAM this stutter disappears. It happened to me in old IL-2 when I had a damm SB Live! sound card.

Heliocon 04-28-2011 06:54 PM

Fail thread - graphics settings are much more GPU dependant than CPU. While it may run on a dual core, that doesnt mean a dual core is good for the game, because it handicaps you when you start adding more aircraft etc.

So changing graphics settings is a bad/invalid way to test because its very much GPU and ram/vram dependant.

Mattius 04-28-2011 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sigur_ros (Post 275183)
Why surprised? Well known by now it is not multicore and uses only single core.

Because my CPU peaks at 2.53ghz!

Buster_Dee 08-06-2011 02:29 PM

I have an old 790i-based, E8500 dual-core with GTX-480, 8G RAM. It's not stable with any overclock (790 doesn't like 8G), so CPU at stock numbers, but RAM slowed down. (I can play with 3.7-4.2G CPU speeds, but get CTDs).

Anyway, I've not played on line, but I get 30-70 in land battles with Campaign-level numbers (6 to 24 a/c in the air, buildings below), all settings maxed (but none to 2X AA) driving 1920-1080 40-in TV. Over big cities, not as playable if my altitude is too low. In most cases, it's very playable. I'm only saying this to suggest that the code is quite a bit more efficient than in '46 (which I still play). My bro's 920 4-core is not nearly as happy, though he's still running a GTX-285.

I have the strong impression that, when the weather etc is unlocked, my rig will not cope. But, the base code does seem to be thoughtfully made. I'm guessing that, when multi-core support improves, I'll get a small improvement, and my bro will stop snubbing the game.

All guesses of course. I'm a convicted eye-candy junky and model/texture a bit. I'll never be particulary objective because my tactical/flying skills lead to one outcome: I'm the 1st guy shot down. I'm salivating over running around these believable airfields and running the tower, a/c maintenance, defenses, refueling/re-arming, and crash crew. Or, I'll gladly defend convoys from strafings. I might torque those who'd like every line of code to add to the flight/gunnery challenge, but I can dream :)

NedLynch 08-06-2011 04:07 PM

Cazador, why did you set the number of prerendered frames to 0?
Just asking since I have been playing around with that as well.

logan3759 08-06-2011 04:51 PM

Hi guys, I want to pick up CoD when the price here in the US comes down a bit.
Can someone please tell me if I can run it OK at medium/low settings @ 1600-900 (my monitor's native res.) with the rig in my sig. Thanks!


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.