Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Friday 2010-03-05 Screenshots/Video and Discussion Thread (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=13669)

Lucas_From_Hell 03-08-2010 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alien (Post 148586)
Oleg, a question I think never quested:
Will in SOW be drastic disadvantage of Messerschmitt Bf 109 in right-turns modelled in FM?

Anyone has some solid data on this? It seems to be a constant that most allied fighter pilots considered it a boast, but just in case turned right when possible.

Post-war flight tests confirmed or denied the myth?

AndyJWest 03-08-2010 07:58 PM

I suspect that most single-prop planes will turn better one way than the other, but can't see any particular reason why it should be more 'drastic' in a Bf-109 than in any other type. If the general torque, gyroscopic and p-effects are modelled correctly, there should be no reason to treat the 109 as a special case without strong evidence.

Richie 03-08-2010 11:19 PM

I try never to turn right but it all has to do wit torque. Don't all single engine aircraft have propellers? Why is it such a big deal with a 109. I would think a small plane like a Yak 3 would also be effected.

Flyby 03-08-2010 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by airmalik (Post 148594)
I'd like my pilot's head position and orientation in external views to be linked to where I'm looking at in the cockpit. So if I'm using a 6DOF head tracking system, someone looking at me from an external view, eg. my wingman, would see all my movements. Ability to make hand signals would be great too.

I was thinking along those exact lines! Too bad I watered it down. But you said precisely what I was originally thinking. (sometimes my mind-melding technique has a delayed reaction :D ***Send me all your money!!!***)

Richie 03-08-2010 11:28 PM

But turning left I find I can out turn a P-40 in an F4 if I'm careful

RAF74_Winger 03-09-2010 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucas_From_Hell (Post 148612)
Anyone has some solid data on this?

I wouldn't call it solid data, but the following may be of interest, from here: http://www.pilotfriend.com/flight_re...reports/33.htm

Quote:

Directional Trim
Absence of rudder trimmer is a bad feature, although at low speeds the practical consequences are not so alarming as the curves might suggest, since the rudder is fairly light on the climb. At high speeds, however, the pilot is seriously inconvenienced, as above 300 mph about 2 1/2 degrees of port (left) rudder are needed for flight with no sideslip and a very heavy foot load is needed to keep this on. In consequence the pilot's left foot becomes tired, and this affects his ability to put on left rudder in order to assist a turn to port (left). Hence at high speeds the Bf.109E turns far more readily to the right than to the left.
W.

AndyJWest 03-09-2010 02:53 AM

Interesting link, Winger.

Note that this refers to high-speed turns, rather than to a general characteristic of the Bf-109. I'd say we need to see how the sim models aircraft behaviour in general before we start asking for any specific 'fixes'. As I suggested earlier, a good physics/flight model should be able to reproduce this based on the known attributes of the aircraft, rather than needing 'tuning' to match test reports. If it doesn't, then maybe adjustment might be necessary.

I notice your link also refers to the heaviness of the 109 elevator at speed, and the consequences of adjusting trim. It looks like Oleg got this about right in IL-2....

RAF74_Winger 03-09-2010 03:59 AM

I'm most interested in the aileron snatching with asymmetric slat deployment - in fact, with IL2, I've never been able to get the slats on the 109 to deploy asymmetrically, don't know whether it's a flight model shortcoming or if the slats are there for show only.

I know that I've never experienced uncommanded roll in the 109, except beyond critical AoA.

W.

RAF74_Winger 03-09-2010 04:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyJWest (Post 148661)
a good physics/flight model should be able to reproduce this based on the known attributes of the aircraft

I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that IL2 had a numerical flight model rather than one which was calculated (like X-plane). I'd be interested to know how the flight model actually works and if this will change in SoW.

W.

waspfarmer 03-09-2010 05:12 AM

That wee car would certainly cut time off my commute...
Very shoddy maintenance on the Heinkel...
You'd better put a lighthouse in to warn ships about the lighthouse.
As far as a release date goes, I absolutely refuse to wait any longer, and am henceforth withholding stool.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.