As publishers go, 505 has been pretty good too. Not only for bringing the game to market in the first place, but also for funding the patch release and sequel. OK, so they get a black mark for the DLC, but still...you wouldn't see Activision or EA treating it with as much care. Ubisoft maybe...I dunno.

Na mate Ubisoft wouldnt even bother with the patch, they would just jump ship right away and the game wouldnt even be in as good a state as it is. You should have seen the debalce that was HAWX. Makes me sick just thinking of it.

Yeah I didn't care for Hawx, I had hopes for it before it came out but after I saw it, Nah, Still though that isn't a WWII flight game.

I'll say it again " as BOP sits right now with no patch,, there is no other WWII flight game on console that is worthy of cleaning its Ass. "

DESODE

LIst
 

1.No breaks for flight sticks.
2.Bad fight models on ALOT of plains.
3.Bad message on multi player that cost us players
4.scoring system that made crashing a good thing.
5.Simulator portion of the game that has a frame problem on lots of TVs makes it impossible to see plains till there on top of you.
6. bomb site DOES NOT WORK in simulator,See a Bomb site even in sim should change for altitude and speed see that`s why it is a bomb site.
7.No patches for this game after all forums regarding this game was filled with complaints.
8.bad control set up for the controller players.The rudder and look around on the same stick "what the hell where they thinking".
9.no cockpits on half the plains
10.crashing on spawn.
11.did I point out the no patch thing..Oh ya I did
11.5. More work and talk on forums about the next game that talk about fixing this one."not a problem with the game itself but it just adds to the reasons people are pissed about this game.
12.when the game came out it came out with the controlls turned all the way up so you had to deal with ITS TO EZ TO STALL THING"see most gamers are stupid the thought of turning down the controls had to be shown to them.The controls should have been at halfway.
13.a AI system thats so weak it took me three days to have all plains and complete the game, all single missions too,Yes on sim.
14. multi system that will sometimes have 10 players in the room and split the teams up 4 on 6 ...??????????
15.NO padlock View.see in life your eyes can follow a target so even in sim there should be a padlock view this is a thing that has been in flight sims since MS flight sim 1998 so it not a new idea.
16.sound for all aircraft really poor.
17.How about the company's involved letting all this happen and not fixing it so there is no one to play with.
18.B-17 armor and lets just say P-51!!!!!!!!!!!!
19.No Tv, magazine,any type of marketing at all.Again back to that no one to play with thing.
20.Cockpits that we do have some are incorrect.The P-51D cockpit is not even close.I have been in one .No not flying, on the ground at a air show .But I have seen it and it`s just like the P-51B."Just a stupid mistake"
Ok should I go on. I have more.
OK theres a short list And im doing this at work I dont have the game in to check I can come up with more if I take more that 2 min to think about it ,but this is the off the top of my head stuff .You ask for a list. Be careful what you ask for!!!!

Everything on your list has either been acknowledged as a problem, or is purely subjective. I don't see one single item on there that stops me having fun with the game. In fact just last night I had 4 amazing online games...

But as I said before - I'll see my glass as way more than half full, and you can piss in your glass for all I care :-P

Good for you
 

Well good for you,Now Would you like to pay all of us that think this was a complete waste of money back for our games.

LOL no...it's not my fault you didn't try the demo before you bought the game. Or wait to see if it had "problems". Take responsibility for your own actions mate.

I did
 

I did try the demo and with all the bombs on the P-51 I thought it was right .and the demo covered no multi-player.and since you brought it up.
#21 the demo did not show enough of the game to show the problems...

Yep, which is why I also said...
See how I covered both bases there? Because I see how you selectively chose to ignore that part.

Gunny do you have any idea how long a QA process takes?
Guess what, they take a long time. The developers can't just wave their magic wands and fix all the bugs and implement all the suggestions they recieve. It's a process of trial and error that requires patience and diligence.
I'm sorry that you have probelms with BoP, I'm sorry that microsoft is slow when it comes to response from their QA (no i'm not, i hate microsoft) Realise fixing bugs in a game is a process of trial and error, quite often what fixes one bug will cause an entirly new bug to occur.