![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You may think I whine, but I say it as it is. I come here to talk about the state of play from time to time and not to argue the toss with people like you do. God only knows what you'll do when you have nobody to argue with. |
18 months - quite a long time. About the time it takes to get a fully-fledged add-on to market. Or a revised graphics run-time and weather/terrain effects, plus a dynamic campaign and weather system, and maybe an extra plane or two, possibly a theatre.
...or how about a Readme for a beta patch? The thread subject was minimum expectations. I think we have been hovering around minimum expectations for quite a long time. More hovering than a helicopter or Vtol sim. The sense of determined fantasy and unreality at least now seems to be giving way to a general grudging acceptance of the facts, which is progress of a sort. Soit's not all bad. Hopefully now that various ailments are so apparent, the code-doctors can start the treatment. the quesion is, do they amputate, or try and save what is there? Hence at the moment, minimum expectations.... The Ignore button, now my friend (how many people can it hold?) Ben |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is an engine and these guys are artists; this is was we were waiting for from CoD. Also this one is great. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwbm6...layer_embedded Why....they don't buy this engine or make a joint venture instead of waste their time in this poor code, called CoD? Graphic is not all, we know, but CoD what's is? Physic? FM? DM? What? |
And just a point as-well. GLOdarks video was captured and created with an ati 4850. This is what can be achieved with proper coding in graphics.
I agree that 1c should buy the graphics engine back and then add the cem and updated (dear god please update) fm/dm and ai. MP |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.