That is exactly the same as saying: We get a Spitfire, I don't care if it is hardcoded to be painted pink with flowers all over it.

Simple as that.

Sorry but i would understand being concerned about things like that if the game was out 2 years already and everything else would be right. But currently there are clearly more important issues that need to be sorted before something like that.

Winger

No it's more like saying 'lets make a flight sim but make sure we waste huge amounts of time and resource making sure extraneous details like ships are perfect and correct, just because a few rivet countrs might get upset'

Please, enlighten me, what is there to be sorted by their 3D objects texture artists with a higher priority?

When, for the love of god, will you learn that not everyone who works for them can fix the game engine, FM, GUI or net code. They have 3d modelers and texture artists only working on this, so it is perfectly alright to ask for them to fix this.

Fixing this takes ONE texture artist less than 30 minutes. Get over it for pete's sake.

my thought exactly! I'm sorry that a couple of supposed misaligned portholes distract you too much from a good rocket polishing session....be carefull you don't make the pages of your lovely blueprints book too sticky.

Thank you for proving you are a pitiful person. Resorting to personal insults is a clear indication of being unable to solve a matter like this like a mature person worth my consideration.

No insult implied, I just assumed you were a meticulous person who liked things perfect and polished, and would't want to see a wonderfull resource like accurate blueprints ruined by an accidental splashing of polishing fluid.....

There are posts and issues raised, that, IMHO, defies common sense. This simulation has already considerable complexity in it (CEM, DM, FM, etc.). For an instance, I am still over the learning curve that will lead me to master the 109. How many flyable do we have to choose from? And how many time do we need to master each one of them?

It's a complete nonsense asking for new planes at this point, when the devs have plenty of work to do regarding other (far more important) issues. I don't care about E1 or E4 or other aircraft for that mater. The thing we really need are the fixes/tweaks in the FM, DM, CEM of the existent set, not to mention the performance of the software itself.

Let's face it, launching more aircraft will only make things worse, at the cost of not fixing what is left behind and creating even more problems/bugs! The devs already have more than enough work to deal with.

I hope MG will only focuses in the following items:

a) Tune (to near perfection :-P) all the existent content for both SP & MP.

b) Eventually (along the process) add all the content that is currently missing and it shouldn't. (I know, this one is debatable...)

c) Don't waste time and resources with anything else until a) and b) are complied.


Regards.

Great news in regard to the patch. Can't wait till Tuesday to check it out. The game by now is fun to play, luckily, so every update now is an additional bonus, thanks a lot for the honest effort.

Btw, in my work experience texture artists these days are mostly freelancers, hired for certain periods of time and let go once a specific job is done. The art director most of the time has other stuff to do then sit down to fix a couple rivets, 30 minutes or not.

P.S. Fix current FMs and add the Minengeschoss, and I am perfectly happy with the plane set as it is.