Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL2 Mods, discussion and links (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=201)
-   -   Mods discussion, links, etc (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=22748)

Asheshouse 05-19-2011 09:16 AM

In terms of IL2, there is no need for 1C to waste any time on the matter when they have lots of more pressing issues to deal with. Particularly when, as we all know, there are other non official ways to get content into the game, which are not bound by past agreements.

Ultimately when the SoW Series progresses to the Pacific, as it must, the issue will need to be addressed, but by then the position in law may have changed. Either way I suspect a smart copyright lawyer could blow holes in any existing agreements, but this could be costly if NG were to fight it.

NG is not the only problem in the US. Organisations like Lockheed Martin and Boeing have both caused similar problems in the past. In the UK things seem more relaxed but in theory there could be issues. Do you know for example that the term RAF is a registered trademark of the Ministry of Defence, as are the RAF roundels. I'm not aware that this has ever caused any restrictions to model makers or sim creators though.

The RAF museums in the UK sell branded products, like mugs and tee shirts. I guess they are just protecting this, and the proceeds go back into the funding for the museums, which is all good stuff.

Contrary to what has been said earlier the UK still has some old ship builders still exist or are now owned by new companies. Armstrong Vickers and BAe Systems come to mind. However those companies have not sought to claim trademark rights over names of historic ships.

Ibis 05-19-2011 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 282191)
Fantasy repaints and frankenstuff = lame!

I really don't understand all the fuzz about mod packs.
Only real benefit is the different sound IMHO.

------------------------------------------------------

You are joking?????? The maps alone are worth the mods, brilliant work brilliant!!
They allow mission makers a broad canvas on which to place their work and most are just a joy to fly over.
I wont even touch on the great cockpits, sounds, extra aircraft, and Zuti's
work is just mind blowing.
Where have you been for the last couple of years? Man is your education lacking.
cheers,
Ibis.

EJGr.Ost_Caspar 05-19-2011 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ibis (Post 285363)
------------------------------------------------------

You are joking?????? The maps alone are worth the mods, brilliant work brilliant!!
They allow mission makers a broad canvas on which to place their work and most are just a joy to fly over.
I wont even touch on the great cockpits, sounds, extra aircraft, and Zuti's
work is just mind blowing.
Where have you been for the last couple of years? Man is your education lacking.
cheers,
Ibis.


I've been right at the source for the last years and beyond. And my education is at least no based on what's written in forums only and my oppinion is not only based on subjective, superficial impressions.

Maps are no aruments for me towards mods.
Because:

1st: 3rd party map building have been possible before the free and wild modding was existant. 1CM even shared the official maptools with 3rd party.

2nd: as with all other themes in modding, the map building has produced good and bad results, with the bad ones in majority. The good ones have the possibility to come into the stock game (as it was possible already back then). A first example was the Solomons map others will follow.

And the other things you named...
'Great cockpits'... like Ranwers maybe or the 150MB(!) texture approach on P-47 (where 8MB would be enough!)... 'Freddy's texture raping orgy'?
'Extra aircraft'... like the 100 versions of Bf109 or the horrible Frankenplanes?
Zuti's work isn't perfect, a lot of server guys can tell you this. However, it was impressive enough, that it was included in to the stock version as far as it was possible.

Sorry, I don't really need and don't want this. There is so few, regarding mods, that I would say, I do like it and see, that its well done... so that it is in fact in summary not worthy to install a new game version for it.

Go with your oppinion and do like it as much as you want.
I know, you are not knowing, what alot of scrap you do install there beside the few good things.
But that doesn't matter anyway.

Oktoberfest 05-19-2011 02:06 PM

Well, Caspar, if people made 100 variants of 109 it's because they wanted it. Why did you release 20 more versions of Spitfires in your last update if you thought you don't need so many planes from one type, then ?

About new cockpits, well, if you take for example new 190 cockpits from Claymore, you can forget about any standard you have in IL2. At least, his cockpits look like 2011 cockpits. Sure, they are heavy in size, but they look WAAAAY better than standard ones.

About Ranwers, sure it's not always perfect but he's improving and except his cockpits I really dislike, external models are rather good.

Modders also brought great things :
- better looking bombs and rockets,
- New loadouts,
- Weapon corrections, you know, like uneven bomb blasts for bombs of the same type & size...
- etc..

I support TD's work but man, what's with the perpetuous bashing you and Saqson are doing on this board ? If you have too much free time and don't know what to do, go finish that 4.11 instead of trolling about other modders (some of them amateurs but not all of them) doing mods for free, fun, and on their spare time too !

Don't think you guys are the only one to have the talent. That's overly pretentious from you.

KaBoom 05-19-2011 02:08 PM

My first post here at 1C
May I start by quoting AndyJWest,who's thread everyone is posting in

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyJWest (Post 281318)
I see Nearmiss has posted a sticky saying that discussion of mods is now permitted on this forum. Can I take it that it is ok to post links to the mod sites themselves? If so, another sticky with the leading ones (Ultrapack, SAS etc) would be useful.

As Nearmiss says, we shouldn't misuse this so can I make a personal request that everyone tries to avoid negative comments on mod pack FMs etc, and on all the other issues that have led to so much acrimony. Regardless of past issues, 'Classic' IL-2 modding is here to stay, and shows real signs of reaching a more stable and consistent state. Cliffs of Dover seems to have been designed right from the start to be more 'open', so the difference between 'stock' and 'mods' becomes largely an online server issue, rather than anything more fundamental. I think all this suggests that we can put past debates behind us, and work towards producing better sims.

Here I would like to quote a small section of AndyJWest's first post

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyJWest (Post 281318)
As Nearmiss says, we shouldn't misuse this so can I make a personal request that everyone tries to avoid negative comments on mod pack FMs etc, and on all the other issues that have led to so much acrimony.

I assume Nearmiss is a Modertor,
and if so I do wonder why this thread has been allowed to go on like it has.
Especially when a lot of posts are in direct conflict with what was asked by the author

These are just a few of the posts I feel have nothing to do with this thread,
and should have been followed by some Moderation

It seems that certain individuals can carry on however they please...

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaQSoN (Post 282656)

Le0ne
, frankly I really do not believe, I give a sh.t about you, or Hades (whomever that is) or your lame opinions.

If you do not care,why then be so vocal and opinionated

calling peoples opinions lame,
because they do not follow your ideals is rather.... well, lame

Quote:

Originally Posted by ocococ (Post 282835)
The truth is that, all the available IL-2 ModPacks give an unfinished/experimental/buggy/hobby/arcade feeling to IL-2. And this becomes more apparent the more you play them.

More complaining about Modpacks,
against the direct wishes of who started this thread,
you don't seem to follow any rules or guidelines in posting


Quote:

Originally Posted by ocococ (Post 282835)
There isn't a single ModPack out there, that is conservative, that acts "like" an official patch. Improving/adding only what is really needed and only with very HQ stuff.

Instead all the ModPacks have loads of unnecessary changes that mess up the game and destroy the good old IL-2 feeling that we are all used to, while also introducing rookie bugs and incompatibilities.

More complaining of Mod packs,
I wonder why you would even want to be apart of a discussion on Mods
Can you not just ignore something that you do not like,yet others do
Or is it that others like something ,that you do not

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaQSoN (Post 282990)
Absolutely. Who says, they can not? If someone wants 1956, or 1966, or 2366 martian frankenstein invasion - the can have it all in their mods. But not in the official add-on. That's the point of this discussion.

More complaining of Mods,
yet you say they can have it like you don't mind

franken plane modders do not expect there frankenplanes to be in any official add on,so why even think they do

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaQSoN (Post 283183)
List, please. Otherwise - you are a liar.

Do you really need to be calling people liars,
where are your manners


Quote:

Originally Posted by SaQSoN (Post 283784)
I could go through each of your points and explain in detail, why each of them is lame. But I will not. Because a) I know, that if not you, then most of the mod users will not listen to any reasons, so it would be a pure waste of time and effort; b) I respect your preferences and your desire to use mods - in no way I will try to prevent you from having and using them.

Then why be so vocal complaining so much about Mods,Packs ete ete

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaQSoN (Post 282425)
shitty franken-stuff; models, stolen from other games; dubious FM changes

complain,complain,complain...

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaQSoN (Post 282425)
So, basically, the changes in rules of this forum have nothing to do with DT or 1C:MG vision of the further game development.

If this forum has rules,
it must have some basic rules of behaving in an adult manner

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaQSoN (Post 284432)
Well, if DT owned, like 200 Chinese slaves, trained to do 3D modeling, texturing and Java programming, then DT could easily produce a high quality replacement for each franken-plane, cockpit, or object that modders ever put out, in no time. :grin:

Why do the slaves need to be Chinese,
rather a rude and racist comment IMHO

Quote:

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 285436)
I've been right at the source for the last
Sorry, I don't really need and don't want this. There is so few, regarding mods, that I would say, I do like it and see, that its well done... so that it is in fact in summary not worthy to install a new game version for it.

Why post in this thread then,if you do not need or want

This was my first post at this forum,and it may very well be my last!
I suggest that if Mods,Modpacks,Franken planes or whatever else your problems are...that they should be left out of any Mod related threads!

Regards
KaBoom

csThor 05-19-2011 02:18 PM

If you read a bucket of downright nonsense poured over you would you stay out just because you haven't used mods? ;)

Everyone's got an opinion and you are absolutely entitled to have yours. But whoever opened these boards to such discussions must have known what was to come.

Oktoberfest 05-19-2011 02:27 PM

What ? Lame troll by DT members ? Go work on 4.11 instead of doing this.

EJGr.Ost_Caspar 05-19-2011 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oktoberfest (Post 285516)
I support TD's work but man, what's with the perpetuous bashing you and Saqson are doing on this board ?

There is generally only one thing, that we want to show: That many mods (not all) are bad made (either by the lack of knwoledge or the impatience of the authors), and that we are annoyed by the repeated requests to us to include such bad mods into the stock game, and that we are sick of being told to be arrogant, if we state, that we won't do it. Thats basicly all.

I admit, that there have been some picky habitus sometimes and ugly words are spoken. But thats not just us at least.

And its not only about talents... its also about knowledge and how you get it.

EJGr.Ost_Caspar 05-19-2011 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KaBoom (Post 285518)
Why post in this thread then,if you do not need or want

This was my first post at this forum,and it may very well be my last!
I suggest that if Mods,Modpacks,Franken planes or whatever else your problems are...that they should be left out of any Mod related threads!

I didn't read anywhere that this was only a 'Mods save the world' forum.
So why I'm not supposed to write my oppinion about mods here?

KaBoom 05-19-2011 03:49 PM

Do I need to remind you again,with a quote from the author AndyJWest...
what the thread was suppose to be about

The thread was not a "state your opinion" thread on Mods
Why would you assume it was

I suggest go and reading what I posted and quoted to begin with,
more thoroughly this time before posting

Also,go read the authors first post

BTW,nobody said or posted anything about it being a save the mods world thread... let alone let's bad mouth mods and those who have made any

It seems no matter what is posted,it is either to lay blame,insult or for some to defend

I find it all a little bit absurd to say the least
Quite humorous to see how offensive Mods are to some people

Quote:

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 285533)
I didn't read anywhere that this was only a 'Mods save the world' forum.
So why I'm not supposed to write my oppinion about mods here?



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.