Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - Friday 2010-05-07 Dev. update and Discussion Thread

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)

- - Friday 2010-05-07 Dev. update and Discussion Thread (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=14666)

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdMan (Post 159887)

lol @ liking "Achy Breaky Heart" for even a millisecond

Right on, atrocious song from the first hearing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freycinet (Post 159880)

Thanks for calling me a moron.

Let me just quote Oleg in the first posting of this thread:

So easy to call somebody a moron from behind your computer screen. I´d punch you in the face if you did it face to face, but you´re not the kind of person who would dare that, obviously...

haaa hahaha overreact much?

not familiar with the two week quip done to death with il2 hmmm?

and, for your info, in my particular job, people try and punch me on a daily basis usually as im the last kind of person they want to see right at that time, but im still here ;)

and give the e-tuffness a break eh?

lets get back to aeroplanes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by engarde (Post 159953)

sorry, where you come from it is probably normal to call others morons (sad culture you come from, but you cannot help it if that is your culture). It isn't normal where I come from.

ME WANT UPDATE! :-x

:-P

Me want release date !!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zorin (Post 158512)

Made a quick scan from Mr. Vasco's book to prove my point about the position of the ring antenna and aerial.

1. Photograph of a Bf 110 C rear fuselage interior

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/b...stioning_2.jpg

2. Screenshot with marked new positions

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/b...itioning_1.jpg

@ Zorin and others:

1. Main problem is not in C-7 and stuff... Problem (or not - from different points of veiw) is that C-4 (and C-7. made from C-4) was NOT a main and usual model of Bf110 in Battle of Britain. It was actually a war of C-2 and D-0/3 :) Most part of C-4 gone for night fighter regiments. Loss lists of ZG2, ZG26 and ZG76 together with losslists of V./LG1 confirm that.

2. About aircraft itself. As far as I know, C-7 was chosen by MG for fill the "Bf110 Jabo" gap with minimal reworks. And, it was done with elements of "early" or "factory built" Bf110C-7's, and with elements (like Pitot tube and enlarged trims) of "late" or "field" Bf110C-7's, wich were actually mainly Bf110C-1/2/4 "in virginity". There are many photos, BoB period, of Bf110C-7 with VERY different upgrades, like armored windglass, armorplate for pilot e.t.c.

3. Yes, making Bf110D-3 for "Jabo role", wich is closer to history, would be great, but it would need to add some Bf110D-7 elements and rework rear fuselage section. If that would be done, it would need a several weeks to do. All we know, that time is very strickt. So...

4. Let we stay away from pitot and trims on Bf110C-7. We should better ask to show it on Bf110C-4 image. THAT would be critical.

5. Ring antenna, really, must be moved back to 1/2 of fuselage section.

:grin:LOL Excellent , best laugh all day.

Quote:

Originally Posted by philip.ed (Post 160263)

Me want cookies now!

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__..._aufgeregt.jpg