Originally Posted by connie (Post 320204)

More people give it 10 than 100 90 80 combined. Thats kinda disturbing.

Originally Posted by klem (Post 320211)

I'm not surprised as there is a wide spread of hardware, OS's, settings and setup knowledge.

In any case, it is an opinion poll and the results are bound to be subjective. Its sometimes hard to split emotion from objective assessment and lets be honest, the current state of CoD is raising some emotions. That's why I set out my scores in a such way that I could try to be objective and calculate a result rather than go only on gut feeling.

The poll is not a definitive assessment of the technical condition of the game as there can be no unique definition of hardware, OS environment, setup etc.

Nevertheless its a reasonable guide to this forum community's opinion and an insight into how the they are coping with it.

EDIT: I think MG should be encouraged by what they see, there is a concentration of opinion around the "not particularly good but recoverable" area. It could all have been down in the 20's indicating imminent demise of the patient. I just hope people remain as objective and unemotional as possible in their assessment.

Originally Posted by nearmiss (Post 320212)

This is 1C European forums

Look at your address line on browser

UBI you pointed us to > latest information was in April

Things aren't popping here, but if they aren't popping here they aren't popping.

Luthier speaks English very well.

When the developer is ready to release information you can look for it here.

Originally Posted by Tree_UK (Post 320058)

...and they deserve to go bust.

Originally Posted by Zorin (Post 320158)

Good for you, but I have to admit that for me they lost about 90% of it already. Please keep in mind they have "developed" this game for 5+ years! Both of the last expansion packs were mostly developed by third party companies and the only thing they needed to do was the implementation of new planes and maps, which we know now since the "MOD" incident, is not as complicated to do as they wanted us to believe.

The very fact that someone from the community (me) had to tell them that their Bf110 that they happily showcased in dev updates had a number of OBVIOUS flaws should have made me very suspicious. How can a company that has spent the last decade on the subject matter of WWII aviation get something like that wrong? It is beyond me. That 3D guy must have looked at hundreds of photographs of Bf110Cs and, as we were let to believe!, original blueprints. I'd have fired him on the spot!

Originally Posted by David Hayward (Post 320208)

No, the disturbing part is that anyone would take this "poll" seriously.

Originally Posted by Langnasen (Post 320242)

Seconded.