Originally Posted by Evgeny (Post 31534)

I think it's time to stop, guys. We don't need a hacking forum here.

Originally Posted by Evgeny (Post 31534)

I think it's time to stop, guys. We don't need a hacking forum here.

Originally Posted by Lo0n (Post 31531)

it "has been said" but not shown. as for the rest, well apparently the lerche is done by messing with the conf.ini file.
the posted track just shows a lerche in a server, not the version used (i believe 4.05 is easier to change critical files), not the server security settings, nothing other than it being used. it is out of context, and that's what makes it really little else than a standard to gather around for anyone who has already convinced themselves.

want to prove it? post a fraps vid of all the steps, that will cover any doubt.
if you're worried about posting a cheat tutorial, well... according to you there is no need for a tutorial, is there? everyone is doing it already.

and zap, well i didn't read that bit so could you post me a link - always good to have the information. as for intelligence to do it... well, actually looking for it is more of a factor. i guess you're on there more than i am. hey! here's an idea, why don't you do the fraps vid, seeing as you have access.
as for the kiddie thing... well recent poll shows the average age to be pushing into the thirties. there may be other forums you are referring to but i guess that's the only one you've managed to find so far.

Originally Posted by Baron (Post 31522)

So said person was "looking" for undenible proof, said person "wants" concrete evidance?

Pardon my less than perfect english (i know how it enoys u)...but i couldnt care less.


Doenst matter what kind of proof will be posted, there will allways be a "if" or "but" in there somewhere. I hope those with proof (me being one of them) will relize that in the next page or 2 so we can put this joke of a thredh to bed to. A joke, as in: never ending story.

Those with proof can show them where it actually matters, to Oleg for ex. so it can help him come up with a solution (not that i think it will happen). Maby post them over at Ubi zoo showing people what to look out for. Just a couple of examples.


BTW, Im still bilingual, with english as my second language...how about u?


Maby i can post in my native language and u can correct my spelling then to...mmm, how about it?

Originally Posted by Urufu_Shinjiro (Post 31543)

Ok, this is so damn stupid! Someone claims to have proof, the acussed asks to see said proof, the one with proof says "I have it, but I don't think I'll show you". I'm sorry but if you say you have proof and don't produce it then that makes you a liar! I've tried to stay out of these threads because they are going nowhere but this was too much to ignore, I mean the nerve! I can't beleive you actually have the nerve to claim "I have proof" and then when asked to show it for the world to see you are right you say" ummm welll, I have proof but I...I don't wanna show it...", That if fecking insane!!!

Originally Posted by Baron (Post 31542)

The tracks with the Lerche is 4.09...suprises me if there are any doubts about that what so ever.


And your right about the "checkruntime=2 stops only the basement dwelers"..it has only been said...as it has ONLY been said that the Lerche is a old cheat done with confini (first thing iv ever heard about such a easy cheat..wonder why noone used it before)

So, thoose things have only been said, wich leaves us with several tracks showing an ex. of what can be done by a waaay larger group than before. A Lerache on several servers (the biggest ones on HL in fact) where there shouldnt be a Learche......i know cus i fly on several of them myselfe.


I know wich i belive over other claims made or said.


Saying a posted proof is an old cheat doesnt cut it. If u or any onelse wanna contest it.....do so by posting exact same proof showing its a fake. Thats how it works.

Originally Posted by Lo0n (Post 31546)

4.09? really? that doesn't look good for the future then.
and well actually it does cut it. weight of evidence and all that. you have to show it is a valid piece of evidence, using the fraps vid of the whole process. if i wanted to be difficult i could say that this was done in a private dogfight server, named after the famous ones, with a bunch of actors playing the part of the outraged. i don't for a minute think that, but remove any elements of doubt eh baron? oh no, because that would mean you would have to stop the arguments and finger pointing and insults. you don't care for the truth, you just want to carry on with that. repeatedly. you loooove it.

and zap, really... baron is showing you how to troll. do better.