Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Patch 4.10 - Development Updates by Daidalos Team (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=12568)

JG53Frankyboy 07-20-2010 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Romanator21 (Post 170855)
Soooo, do the Grumman Wildcat and Hellcat not apply to the copyright issue? How were they incorporated into the game, but not some battleships, and other aircraft?

man, because there was a secret agreement between UBI, 1C and NG, means most propably NG got already money for the already in PF existing NG stuff !!!
hence the delay of the PacificFighters release - and if there would have not been an agreement , it would have benn never released....................
but sure, UBI and 1C dont want pay more money to put more NG stuff in its game.

JG53Frankyboy 07-20-2010 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanLewis (Post 170810)
Damnation - they changed the gun but kept the cartridge (if indeed it can be called that).

anyone has some datas about this Gebauer MG ?
as it used the same 12,7mm SAFAT round it most propably had the same V0 put it had perhaps a higher rate of fire - as it was driven by the engine crankshaft.............

swiss 07-20-2010 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by csThor (Post 170854)
You have a few hundred thousand $$$ ready just in case NG doesn't follow your argument? No? We don't, either. As such it is simple - let sleeping dogs lie. TD won't touch anything NG-related as Oleg specifically asked us not to. End of discussion.

No I just thought, maybe, someone could ask.

If there already are violations - then we better don't.

Romanator21 07-20-2010 05:25 PM

Ok, thanks for clearing that one up - Such a shame really. So, did the boys at Microsoft also pay up?

SaQSoN 07-20-2010 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy (Post 170857)
but TD is making official patches for a 1C game.

Exactly the point. This patches are still released under 1C logo, copyright and supervision, which makes them subject of the agreement between 1C and NG. Agreement includes both paid and free add-ons.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy (Post 170859)
man, because there was a secret agreement between UBI, 1C and NG, means most propably NG got already money for the already in PF existing NG stuff!!!

Most definitely they did. The amount, they demanded and received is something like 6 digit sum. Which was sliced from 1C share (Ubi escaped unhurt, as far, as I heard, so don't quote me on that ;) ).

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy (Post 170859)
hence the delay of the PacificFighters release - and if there would have not been an agreement , it would have benn never released....................

... At least in US.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy (Post 170859)
but sure, UBI and 1C dont want pay more money to put more NG stuff in its game.

Exactly.

How does it affects SoW and it's possible future add-ons is still unclear. We will see later.

SaQSoN 07-20-2010 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Romanator21 (Post 170868)
Ok, thanks for clearing that one up - Such a shame really. So, did the boys at Microsoft also pay up?

Apparently, one of the NG chairman was also a Microsoft higher authority at the time. Don't know, if it connected in any way. :rolleyes:

And I don't really know, if IL-2 success really had any affect on CFS-3 sales... :rolleyes:

Most probably this things are totally unrelated. :grin:

swiss 07-20-2010 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaQSoN (Post 170870)
patches are still released under 1C logo, copyright and supervision


Is that true?

JG53Frankyboy 07-20-2010 07:01 PM

sure !!

Mysticpuma 07-20-2010 07:29 PM

Okay TD, stepping away from N-G issues, here's a question I hope you may me able to answer.

Is there an easy way to add an option in FMB, that allows users to add custom skins to static aircraft? I say that as I mean without cheating?

To be able to put aircraft on a base and then just 'skin' them as you do with flyable and AI aircraft would be a huge advantage. Is this possible for 4.11 if not already considered for 4.10?

Secondly, is there a list yet (I'm sure there is) of additions that are expected to be in 4.10? I do try and keep up with the updates, but sometimes I miss some.

Cheers, MP

TedStryker 07-20-2010 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mysticpuma (Post 170890)

Is there an easy way to add an option in FMB, that allows users to add custom skins to static aircraft? I say that as I mean without cheating?

To be able to put aircraft on a base and then just 'skin' them as you do with flyable and AI aircraft would be a huge advantange

+a million

This would be massive for mission builders.

Thanks for the update TD-R.E.2000 looking great!


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.