Official Fulqrum Publishing forum
Page 113 of 215 « First 1363103111112 113 114115123163213 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Patch 4.10 - Development Updates by Daidalos Team (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=12568)

_1SMV_Gitano 06-17-2010 09:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunger (Post 164938)
Hi TD folks

I just feel plain curious, since we haven´t seen any recent 4.10 updates I asume that RL must suddenly be very busy (Having worked on "volunteer" software development myself i have some insight into that, you usually have another job to put meat on the table and a family to tend to, as well as plenty other intrests one has in life like watching the World Cup).

My question is plainly how are things proceeding ?, is all Ok, did you get bitten by "Bugs outa hell" ? Is the team in good health ?

Kind Regards
Hunger
All team is deeply involved in the beta testing

Bobb4 06-17-2010 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by _1SMV_Gitano (Post 164947)
All team is deeply involved in the beta testing
Hi guys, great job you are doing. Just wondering will there be a 4.10 beta or will it be a straight 4.10 release?

Avimimus 06-17-2010 04:02 PM
+1 on SCW. We have the I-15, older model I-16s, early SB-2 and the R-5. All that we need are two-four Axis aircraft and two-three esoterics (ie. export aircraft that served in SCW but not WWII) and a map!

Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 164883)
In fact we rather rely on players, namely mission- and campaign builders. We know there are lots out there and as this doesn't require any more equipment than the game itself, we think, its better to save our limited ressources for different topics.
One of the real limitations of the Il-2 releases is that they lacked small campaigns or missions for aircraft introduced in patches (and often in new versions of the game).

IMHO, it would be great if we had a second team pulling together high-quality missions featuring the new aircraft that could be released as an addition download.

If need be such a team could work one tier behind using the publicly released patch (as opposed to the betas). I think it would add a lot if a 4.09 mission pack was being built to coincide with the release of 4.10.

WTE_Galway 06-18-2010 02:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avimimus (Post 165006)
+1 on SCW. We have the I-15, older model I-16s, early SB-2 and the R-5. All that we need are two-four Axis aircraft and two-three esoterics (ie. export aircraft that served in SCW but not WWII) and a map!
Almost all my skinning over the years has been 1930's aircraft :D

More SCW would be awesome.

IceFire 06-18-2010 03:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avimimus (Post 165006)
+1 on SCW. We have the I-15, older model I-16s, early SB-2 and the R-5. All that we need are two-four Axis aircraft and two-three esoterics (ie. export aircraft that served in SCW but not WWII) and a map!



One of the real limitations of the Il-2 releases is that they lacked small campaigns or missions for aircraft introduced in patches (and often in new versions of the game).

IMHO, it would be great if we had a second team pulling together high-quality missions featuring the new aircraft that could be released as an addition download.

If need be such a team could work one tier behind using the publicly released patch (as opposed to the betas). I think it would add a lot if a 4.09 mission pack was being built to coincide with the release of 4.10.
Sounds like something that a team of mission builders could be working on if they were to organize. Or it can happen in a disorganized fashion as well. I know quite a bit of the 4.09 content has already been used. Surely that will happen a few months after 4.10 is out as well. I was personally thinking about a short Hs129 campaign.

EJGr.Ost_Caspar 06-18-2010 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bf-110 (Post 164791)
Indeed,MiG-15 is fantastic!
The F-86 cokpit is even more!If MiG-15 get a decent cockpit,maybe it can be incorpored into IL2.
Both planes are not made in IL-2 standards. Good looking for you in the first or second look, but the problem lies deeper in the models.

And the F86 cockpit exceedes the given limits so much, thats its not even worth to be considered. Sorry.




EDIT: there is no need of a cockpit for a plane to be incorporated, as you say. It can be AI with an option to get a cockpit later. Just BTW. :)

EJGr.Ost_Caspar 06-18-2010 06:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bf-110 (Post 164894)
Two front war?While DT works on Europe he will focus at pacific?
JC is working on his projects as 3rd party with our help (if needed).
He has more or less close contact to us and we hope his efforts will lead to the implementation of what he likes to bring along, given, that standards are kept of course. Looks good, I'd say.

We are not closing our eyes before the PTO, not at all. Future work will hopefully reorientate more into that direction. But you are right, 4.10 still plays mainly in Europe.

David603 06-18-2010 07:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 165263)
Both planes are not made in IL-2 standards. Good looking for you in the first or second look, but the problem lies deeper in the models.

And the F86 cockpit exceedes the given limits so much, thats its not even worth to be considered. Sorry.
This I can vouch for. I have used many modded cockpits over the years and I have a powerful computer, but this is the first one I have seen that I can say caused visible slowdown for my PC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 165265)
JC is working on his projects as 3rd party with our help (if needed).
He has more or less close contact to us and we hope his efforts will lead to the implementation of what he likes to bring along, given, that standards are kept of course. Looks good, I'd say.

We are not closing our eyes before the PTO, not at all. Future work will hopefully reorientate more into that direction. But you are right, 4.10 still plays mainly in Europe.
I have noticed that JapanCat is making a new version of his A6M visual update. I take it this is to bring it up to DT standards?

ElAurens 06-18-2010 09:41 PM
Thak you Caspar for keeping the Pacific theater alive.

If I had the ability I would make or fund a new 3D model for the Hawk 81 series, and I hope that someone is working on a P40N for use in China.

The entire China, Burma, India Thertre of Operations is a very neglected "forgotten battle" that has an amazing wealth of plane types, terrain, and campaigns over the entire span of the Second World War, and actually many years prior.

Imagine Curtiss Hawk biplanes flying along side I-15s trying to intercept Japanese Fiat bombers escorted by Ki 27s, or A5Ms?

I drool over the idea.

Flying_Nutcase 06-19-2010 12:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 164883)
In fact we rather rely on players, namely mission- and campaign builders. We know there are lots out there and as this doesn't require any more equipment than the game itself, we think, its better to save our limited ressources for different topics.
That's great to hear. As you say, there's plenty of talented and dedicated campaign builders in the community. Keeping your focus on stuff that only TD can do makes sense 100%.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 AM.
Page 113 of 215 « First 1363103111112 113 114115123163213 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.