Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - Communication and work with community

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)

- - Communication and work with community (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=34018)

Helpful list of common issues posted here:

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...792#post456792

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackSix (Post 456323)

I think no. We are not planning this.

Black six this statement of you about Coops (Multiplayer Cooperative missions) doesn't sound good, as many of the people here are waiting for this to be able to run coops missions with their squad mates, actually this one of the features that most of the users/costumers are looking for, as is vital for squads that fly online in cooperative custom made campaigns/missions.
This should be a top priority issue to work on along with the net code problems.

Now what we should expect for CloD, as you stated, there will be no new planes, no coops features. So you will only work on the engine??? what we should expect for the sequel??? last question is vital cause many people here wants to know if the whole sim will become an MMO, or the Il-2 franchise will still being a pure flight sim???

Regs

Potz

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATAG_Dutch (Post 456696)

I have a question for BlackSix if I may;

Blacksix, are the development team aware of the fact that the 'engine temperature effects' setting of the game reduces the performance of all aircraft in the game by varying amounts when switched on? Affecting some aircraft more than others?

Is this an issue currently being worked on in order to reduce the effect?

I'll ask on Monday.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madfish (Post 456702)

Looking forward to the announcements in the coming next week. I hope the Su26 will be part of it :P

I didn't promise announcements in the coming next week, I promised more info about our situation and communication.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kwiatek (Post 456704)

Well i think double facepalm work good too for 1C FM's :P

Yes, of course.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kwiatek (Post 456704)

Well if 1C would clarify FM&performace subcject and would inform us what they are planning to do and what bug and errors are known i think any facepalm would be not nessesery for any side.

I didn't mean to offend you, but I have written several times that I don't want to debate FM in this topic.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazex (Post 456706)

B6 - don't let the negative whiners destroy this great initiative for the rest of us! Most of us really appreciate that you take the time to give us as much information as you can!

And your English is really improving! Well done!

Thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by PotNoodles (Post 456724)

A "common question" is something that keeps popping up all of the time and one that could do with an answer. All of the questions I have seen in this thread are the ones most commonly mentioned in this forum. Maybe you should draw up a list of what we can talk about and what we cannot talk about. Clearly some people don't understand what you mean when you say "answers to common questions" and then reply like you have done above.

Yes, I'll draw.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOA_Potenz (Post 456814)

We can fix CloD only. We can't add anything.
We'll tell about next project in the announcement. I've an embargo on the disclosure of any details.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackSix (Post 456892)

......................
I didn't mean to offend you, but I have written several times that I don't want to debate FM in this topic.
......................

BlackSix

Will you please point us to the Thread where you are willing to debate the FMs and which both you and the developers are reading. We would like to know that you are all aware of precisely what we are unhappy with and not just rely on what the devs may be thinking on their own. I haven't seen any acknowledgement of our specific concerns or what it is they are correcting, just 'we are working on it'.

Quote:

Originally Posted by klem (Post 456919)

I think that they are looking at the bugtracker reports for FM disputes with any supportive arguments...no one should expect them to participate in the numerous FM threads. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlipBall (Post 456927)

I think that they are looking at the bugtracker reports for FM disputes with any supportive arguments...no one should expect them to participate in the numerous FM threads. :)

Exactly but there was talk of devs not speaking english etc. So 'where' and is it being co-ordinated or are they just making random pickings?

Quote:

Originally Posted by klem (Post 456952)

Exactly but there was talk of devs not speaking english etc. So 'where' and is it being co-ordinated or are they just making random pickings?

I would guess that most of their information about FM complaints, comes from reading the Russian bugtracker report's and the FM threads at sukhoi.ru...maybe B6 can list here for us, some of the more common Russian complaints about the FM's. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by klem (Post 456919)

I'm not prepared to discuss this issue, I'm not an expert. I can compile a list of bugs and convey to our programmer. Feedback will not. I'll do it in the future, not now.
Tomorrow I'll start collecting bugs in special themes on strictly limited issues. Details will be tomorrow.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlipBall (Post 456953)

maybe B6 can list here for us, some of the more common Russian complaints about the FM's. :)

If you add an additional 5 or 6 hours by days, I'll be able, yes.

Ilya has been emailed the information on correct FM and flight operation for Hurricane and Spitfire from a reliable source before the last 2 patches, and ongoing. I can't say more because I was asked not to, which is why I only whine that the FM's aren't fixed rather than supply further information - ie, Ilya has all he needs. Why it is still not correct I do not know and I'd doubt that B6 does either ;) - the findings on speeds when temperature effects is turned off though is very interesting.