Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   FM/DM threads (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=196)
-   -   Huricane Mk I 100 Octane perormance tests 1.07.18301 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=33135)

Seadog 07-14-2012 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomcatViP (Post 444967)
Ok next time you take a Diesel, I suggest yu might try to put some 95 or 98 gasoline while I'll try myself to put diesel in a gasoline car. We will see who has the biggest bill.

What the hell does diesel have to with this?

CaptainDoggles 07-14-2012 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomcatViP (Post 444967)
Ok next time you take a Diesel, I suggest yu might try to put some 95 or 98 gasoline while I'll try myself to put diesel in a gasoline car. We will see who has the biggest bill.

Thanks for confirming you have no idea what you're talking about. Diesels use compression ignition. Gasoline engines have a spark plug.

I'm done talking to you now, have a nice day!

TomcatViP 07-14-2012 09:31 PM

Damn the Diesel have a low eq octane number. This is an example. An illustration. Ok got it now?

I will remind you that you slipped the purpose of our conversation from : "the octane does not rate what E you can output in a compression work" to "detonation and deflag."

But as always simplistic argument and quick assumption on individual are the way to go with the 100octaner. One more in a long series.

Do you really think that I don't know the diff btw Diesel and gasoline? If such salute and have a good day back to your black and white world.*

What i was showing you is that with higher grade you hve higher energy in the same volume of the cylinder hence more heat hence (what I was expecting you'd understand by yourself) more wear since the eng is not designed for that amount.

We are not talking about a 2L 90Hp car but 1000HP with primitive engine technology with low compression ratio (a lot more fuel flow).

Thx for loosing my time too.

*I hve to admit that writing this my blood was boiling up to its flash point. Sry for being rude

phoenix1963 07-15-2012 10:14 AM

Back on topic....

"British Performance Reduction Methods for Modern Aircraft", D Cameron - A. & AEE Report No. Res/170, 1942.

Is cited by papers on googlescholar. Spitfireperformance.com has many references to test data from later Spitfire marks being normalised using this method to some standard atmosphere.

I've looked on "Web of Knowledge" and some other places but have not been able to get a copy.

I suspect that, since Cameron felt it necessary to write a paper in 1942 to standardise the methods, other variants were probably used before. I'll continue trying to find it.

56RAF_phoenix

TomcatViP 07-15-2012 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phoenix1963 (Post 445186)
Back on topic....

"British Performance Reduction Methods for Modern Aircraft", D Cameron - A. & AEE Report No. Res/170, 1942.

Is cited by papers on googlescholar. Spitfireperformance.com has many references to test data from later Spitfire marks being normalised using this method to some standard atmosphere.

I've looked on "Web of Knowledge" and some other places but have not been able to get a copy.

I suspect that, since Cameron felt it necessary to write a paper in 1942 to standardise the methods, other variants were probably used before. I'll continue trying to find it.

56RAF_phoenix

take care that perf predictions were not accurate during the war as they didn't hve the knowledge that became available after the war*. I think there is something with the Glauert correcting factor that you might be interested to investigate.

*does not apply in calibrated range (rare)

Crumpp 07-15-2012 07:32 PM

Search the PROCAT for:

DSIR 23/12282

gimpy117 07-16-2012 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles (Post 444986)
Thanks for confirming you have no idea what you're talking about. Diesels use compression ignition. Gasoline engines have a spark plug.

I'm done talking to you now, have a nice day!

ha ha yeah. diesel is a lot different than 100LL

TomcatViP 07-16-2012 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gimpy117 (Post 445504)
ha ha yeah. diesel is a lot different than 100LL

humm Gympy put that hand ON the table

gimpy117 07-16-2012 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomcatViP (Post 445567)
humm Gympy put that hand ON the table

?? I dunno just from a fuel aspect.

my .02 is that we just give ALL the planes the best Octane available have 100 Octane Me-109's, Spits etc. etc.

then nobody can complain

TomcatViP 07-16-2012 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gimpy117 (Post 445635)
?
then nobody can complain

even on the CoD forum ? :rolleyes:


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.