too bad your sig doesn't reflect that thought though....

really?!! and on which facts are you supporting your above statement, please?

the fact of your sig ;)

go figure....

assuming my computer's hardware can not have anything to do with this, I thought it must be about my ignore list.. and you've just confirmed it..

but..

are you saying this because you are in it, and you think you do not deserve to be in it, or because I do have an Ignore list at all?

and let me tell you right from the start, as you've just saw, I do still check those persons' posts and read them when they do deserve to be read. I just think 10 times before answering them, because I do not want to be dragged down in flame wars.

and let me tell you another fact, those persons are in there not because they do not share my believes and thoughts, but because they prove to not be reasonable persons with which you can have a mature argument. that's all, and hence their presence in that list.

it is not me who put them in there, but their own actions!

Actually it was quite clear in the place... no mistaking it, but, I suppose that what happens when one chooses to ignore, eh


oh, I think you mean debate not argument, no argument is mature - that's what starts wars in the first place, that being a lack of reasoned ability to see all sides equally


and if you are going to "check" doesn't that preclude the use of an "ignore list" in the first place and is what you have listed in your sig really necessary? It seem like a really childish item to have in a sig... something else which also starts wars, that being childishness (so now you edit your "list") and it was actually you who put them there (see my second point)

lol. "additional voices" ftw.:-P

lol +1

yes, I meant debate, sorry, I'm not a native english speaker, and I've learnt it all by my own ear (I've studied russian and german in highschool).

and no, it actually help me prevent wars by discouraging aggression from a party who sees it in my signature, and thinks I can not see his replays to my posts, therefore drops the matter dead.

it's called psychological warfare :)

and well, your post just convinced me have another look at the famous list: split it in two accordingly with the actions which got them in there in the first place, and reconsidering some from the chorus by checking their latest posts in this forum.

PS: btw, your place still remains at the head of the additional voices, and it's only your position expressed in this thread (regarding WWII involved parties real actions) which prevents you to be promoted to stardom (due to your whine-bashing posts).. yet :)

but there is no need for warfare of any kind, this is a forum... and your errm, ploy, doesn't work because people now know you check - enjoy

nah, I don't really think they'll see these few posts in here :)