Ze-Jamz |
10-21-2011 06:33 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES
(Post 352336)
Oh you can bet he will!
On that note.. Is it just me.. Or does there seem to be more to it than some of these whinners are letting on? I mean really.. All this over $50 for a game? Most of these guys sound like they spend $1,000+ on a prom dress and Oleg never showed up to take them to the prom. :rolleyes:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES
(Post 352133)
Ah I see we have a IL-2 cherry in our midst
|
What you going on about you fool?
Prom? prom dress?... If it bothers you that much go away, people can bitch, moan, kick up, stress as mush as they like regardless of cost..get yer head out yer a$$
Judging by your reply to my last post you obviously have no clue what your going on about do you 'Ace'?
Again..a lil clue, SOOOOO this game has the right to print what it likes on the back of its cover because it has a 'future proof engine'?
I think your find that every other vid game's 'recommended' spec's will allow the user to play the game on settings more than f-kin MED!
You go on about and bash the whiners here... Please dont insult mine and everyone elses intelligence by saying the game was fine on release but 'we' should of had better hardware to play it on!
P.S Im more than aware of IL2 and what it was like on its release..and Yes it happened then too but 'that' does not warrant it happening again or justify it..
f*k me, you actually sound like your saying there were no bugs, nothing wrong with the code, nothing wrong with the engine and it all comes down to hardware and that we should of known that 'recommended' means MED-HIGH end rigs can only play this game on LOW-MED settings
tool
|