![]() |
Wow huge dissapointment, they really dropped the ball. More people currently use DX11 than dx10 and DX9 than dx10. Big dissapointment :confused:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
According to the steam hardware survey, which is about the most comprehensive, the most accurate survey of PC gamer hardware, only about 5% of PC gamers are on a DX11-capable system. About 21% are on DX9 systems, and the rest are DX10. But apparently 21 + 73 > 5. http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey |
Quote:
|
Who cares if its DX11. If the game looks as good as it does on the screenshots, who gives a f* if that is achieved through DX7, DX11 or OpenGL?
For those with ATI cards worrying; ATi are notoriously bad with OpenGL drivers, the fact CoD is a DirectX game (unlike IL2 which was opengl) gives you a good chance it will run fine. ATI's directx drivers are usually okay these days. As for the specs; dont read too much in to it. For some perspective, if you read the minimum requirements for IL2, they are: • Windows 98/ME/2000/XP • 1 GHz Processor Pentium 3 or equivalent • 512 MB RAM • DirectX 9.0 compatible 64MB Graphics Card • 4 GB Free Hard Disk Space Required I dont think you will enjoy IL2 a whole lot with those specs. I dont mean to say CoD will be as bad on minimum specs, but there is so much variation depending on settings, maps, that its easy to bring a core i7 with a geforce 580 to its knees, while you can make it rather fluid on a 5 year old Athlon 64 with a geforce 7900. So a few arbitrary "minimum' and 'recommended' configs dont tell us a whole lot, if there is no mention of framerates or resolutions. I guess we will find out when it ships :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What you say is probably obvious (anything better/newer than specified should work) but it's funny how excitement can cause us all to go in panic mode at the slightest drop of the hat :grin: In any case these are VERY reasonable specs, congrats on the optimization process. Sure, i don't expect it to run at full with those settings, but a mid to high end PC purchased in the last two years will probably have no trouble running it at medium or medium-high settings on a reasonable resolution (single monitor). Heck, i don't expect most PCs to be able to max it out as it is, especially if we consider the disabled features. They're disabled for a reason after all...you know, the people who will crank everything up to max even if there's no hardware that can run it yet and then complain that it's a poor job because it stutters ;) I'm using an i7 920 (no overclocking) with Ati 4890 1GB and 3GB of RAM (i might get another 3 after i test run the sim a few times) and i'm very happy with the specs. Also, Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Is it just blahblah? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.