KiloAlpha4
07-06-2009, 06:01 PM
I'm not the only one starting to get angry at this crap but there is no way a tiger 2 would survive 2 russian is3's firing 122 mm ap at it and a isu 152 firing a 152mm he at it at point blank range and yet be unscathed ...but magically, the tiger could kill all of them with 1 or 2 shots max...that's B.S.
Maybe their is a hack out there, or maybe your game has some major balance issues yet to be resolved. In either case for the love of god go by the actual freaking stats for the tanks...jeesh..
here:
king tiger: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_II
is3: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iosif_Stalin_tank
regarding the tiger 2's armor and allied penetration/guns:
The American M26 Pershing (using tungsten HVAP ammunition), the British Comet with the 77 mm gun, and the Soviet IS-2 (using steel shot) had to be within 1300 m, 500 m and 200 m respectively.
....which means that at point blank range like he was against 2 is3's and a isu 152, he would have been severely fk'd....but nope, magically unscathed tiger 2 as always...
Maybe their is a hack out there, or maybe your game has some major balance issues yet to be resolved. In either case for the love of god go by the actual freaking stats for the tanks...jeesh..
here:
king tiger: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_II
is3: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iosif_Stalin_tank
regarding the tiger 2's armor and allied penetration/guns:
The American M26 Pershing (using tungsten HVAP ammunition), the British Comet with the 77 mm gun, and the Soviet IS-2 (using steel shot) had to be within 1300 m, 500 m and 200 m respectively.
....which means that at point blank range like he was against 2 is3's and a isu 152, he would have been severely fk'd....but nope, magically unscathed tiger 2 as always...