IL2 - Battle of Stalingrad

[nic727]

Hi,

I just saw some footage from the new game and its just look awesome. :)
It will certainly be better than the default COD (with ATAG patch is better).

I hope they will put a DVD edition, because in my country we can't download a full game because Internet cost a lot if we download too much. My country is Canada :(

Whatever, can't wait to play this game. The only thing is that I will not stop to play Il2 1946 :)

Links for video :
http://www.simhq.com/air-combat/il2-sturmovik-battle-stalingrad-preview.html

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=73364656

http://www.simhq.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/full-11236-62646-il2_sturmovik_6.jpg
http://abload.de/img/1nbjbt.jpg
http://abload.de/img/2s4jis.jpg
http://abload.de/img/147mj8p.jpg
http://abload.de/img/1623kxq.jpg
http://abload.de/img/121jjfx.jpg

[76.IAP-Blackbird]

Pics are great! Dont you have flatrates over there?!

[Thaeris]

Sorry about the DL situation, mate. There seems to be a group of SOBs that are intent on fouling up North America at some level or other.

Greetings from the nation below you!

[Woke Up Dead]

Wow Nic, which part of Canada are you in, what provider do you have? No such problems here in Vancouver. Are you in la belle provence where they like to do things a bit differently?

[nic727]

Wow Nic, which part of Canada are you in, what provider do you have? No such problems here in Vancouver. Are you in la belle provence where they like to do things a bit differently?

Yeah, I'm in Quebec and it cost about 50$ for 90Gb limit and 5$ for extra GB :(

[MOH_Hirth]

I am very impressive with the videos IL-2 BOS, i buy yesterday my Pré-order GOLD, 1C veterans + 777studio talent is a sure of at least a great simulator... now just... two months be sure!

[IceFire]

Yeah, I'm in Quebec and it cost about 50$ for 90Gb limit and 5$ for extra GB :(
I'm on Cogeco in Ontario and I pay the same and I'm not concerned in the least. Even with heavy regular use, some Netflix streaming, game playing, etc. I rarely run even to 80% of the cap.

If the game comes out and it's 10GB... there's still lots of headroom for regular usage...

[bf-110]

I'll have to wait to try BoS.First because I have to know what we are dealing with: a game that is made to run even at your 386 or prototypes only.

[K_Freddie]

I'll have to wait to try BoS.First because I have to know what we are dealing with: a game that is made to run even at your 386 or prototypes only.

I gather you mean a 386 processor.. then this is good and has far reaching marketability. It also means we probably are dealing with developers who are very experience in PC systems which can only mean well for the longevity of the game.

386 is a 32 bit system, and the code can just do a system inspection and choose to run code modules based on this (even switch to 64 bit) - perfect scalability sense.

A smaller, less powerful system will run less intensive code while the latest PC will run a full blown version... all automated in code.
:)

[IceFire]

I'll have to wait to try BoS.First because I have to know what we are dealing with: a game that is made to run even at your 386 or prototypes only.

Can you play Rise of Flight? http://riseofflight.com/

The system requirements will likely be fairly similar seeing as they use the same engine and supporting technologies.

[Kittle]

Yea I was pretty excited when they said any system that can run RoF well will run BoS well. I can run RoF quite nicely on my crap system. It's only saving grace is the 9800GT gfx card and that was the difference between playing RoF and watching a slide show on my system. I can't run CloD very well at all on any but the lowest graphics settings so looking forward to playing BoS.

As it is IL2 1946 4.12 is pretty outstanding and I don't see it leaving my system ever. They are going to run a similar DLC system in BoS that they do in RoF. I bought the ICE edition to get a full 9 aircraft when I got into RoF (10 now with the freebie N.17(GBR) that they gave to previous N.17 owners) and I suspect I will do something similar with BoS.

[bf-110]

I gather you mean a 386 processor.. then this is good and has far reaching marketability. It also means we probably are dealing with developers who are very experience in PC systems which can only mean well for the longevity of the game.

386 is a 32 bit system, and the code can just do a system inspection and choose to run code modules based on this (even switch to 64 bit) - perfect scalability sense.

A smaller, less powerful system will run less intensive code while the latest PC will run a full blown version... all automated in code.
:)

Oh lord...made a small informatics joke and got a full tech answer.LOL :confused:

Yes,Rise of Flight runs well on my machine.Probably BoS won't run as beautiful here as on the SSs,but if it runs like RoF,I am more than satisfied.

[Aardvark892]

Yay! Another whole round of "you porked my fave airplane!" or "The 109 is WAY better than this!" or "No way the MiG's can fly that fast without overheating" or all the other stupid arguments that happen everytime a new WWII air combat sim comes out, especially from 1C.

[Woke Up Dead]

Yay! Another whole round of "you porked my fave airplane!" or "The 109 is WAY better than this!" or "No way the MiG's can fly that fast without overheating" or all the other stupid arguments that happen everytime a new WWII air combat sim comes out, especially from 1C.

At least this one won't have any complaints about 50-cals until future expansion packs.

[IceFire]

Yay! Another whole round of "you porked my fave airplane!" or "The 109 is WAY better than this!" or "No way the MiG's can fly that fast without overheating" or all the other stupid arguments that happen everytime a new WWII air combat sim comes out, especially from 1C.

Happens every time and I'm actively avoiding them now. If I see an actual real issue, I'll report it and then move on and just enjoy the game this time. That's what I keep telling myself :)